Skip to main content

Significance Is in the Eye of the Stakeholder

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 5714)


Custodians of digital content take action when the material that they are responsible for is threatened by, for example, obsolescence or deterioration. At first glance, ideal preservation actions retain every aspect of the original objects with the highest level of fidelity. Achieving this goal can, however, be costly, infeasible, and sometimes even undesirable. As a result, custodians must focus their attention on preserving the most significant characteristics of the content, even at the cost of sacrificing less important ones. The concept of significant characteristics has become prominent within the digital preservation community to capture this key goal. As is often the case in an emerging field, however, the term has become over-loaded and remains ill-defined. In this paper, we unpack the meaning that lies behind the phrase, analyze the domain, and introduce clear terminology.


  • Digital preservation
  • properties
  • characteristics
  • significant properties
  • significant characteristics
  • applicable properties
  • requirements

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04346-8_29
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-04346-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, C., et al.: A generic XML language for characterising objects to support digital preservation. In: SAC 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 402–406 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, C., et al.: Plato: A Service Oriented Decision Support System for Preservation Planning. In: JCDL 2008, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (June 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, A.: White Paper: Representation Information Registries. PLANETS report PC/3-D7 (2008),

  4. CCSDS. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). CCSDS 650.0-B-1, Blue Book (the full ISO standard) (January 2002),

  5. CEDARS Project,

  6. Chaudhri, V., Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., Karp, P., Rice, J.: OKBC: A programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability. In: Proceedings of the 1998 National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clausen, L.: Opening Schroedinger’s Library: Semi-automatic QA reduces uncertainty in object-transformation. In: Kovács, L., Fuhr, N., Meghini, C. (eds.) ECDL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4675, pp. 186–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Dappert, A., Ballaux, B., Mayr, M., van Bussel, S.: Report on policy and strategy models for libraries, archives and data centres. PLANETS report PP2-D2 (2008),

  9. Dappert, A., Farquhar, A.: Modelling Organisational Goals to Guide Preservation. In: iPRES 2008: The Fifth International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (2008),

  10. Hockx-Yu, H., Knight, G.: What to Preserve?: Significant Properties of Digital Objects. In: Report on the JISC/BL/DPC Workshop of April 7, 2008, British Library Conference Centre (2008); The International Journal of Digital Curation 3(1) (2008),

  11. IFLA Study Group: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998), (Retrieved on December 1, 2007)

  12. Knight, G.: Framework for the definition of significant properties (2008),

  13. Knight, G., Pennock, M.: Data Without Meaning: Establishing the Significant Properties of Digital Research. In: iPRES 2008: The Fifth International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (2008),

  14. National Archives of Australia: An Approach to the Preservation of Digital Records (December 2002),

  15. PREMIS Editorial Committee: PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata, Version 2 (March 2008),

  16. The OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata: Preservation Metadata and the OAIS Information Model. A Metadata Framework to Support the Preservation of Digital Objects (2002),

  17. Rothenberg, J.: Preserving Authentic Digital Information. In: Authenticity in a Digital Environment. The Council on Library and Information Resources (2000),

  18. Rusbridge, C.: Excuse me...some digital preservation fallacies? Ariadne, 46 (February 2006), , ISSN 1361-3200

  19. The National Archives: PRONOM,

  20. Warmer, A., Kleppe, A.: The Object Constraint Language. In: Getting Your Models Ready for MDA, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson, A.: Significant Properties Report, InSPECT Work Package 2.2, Draft/Version 2 (2007),

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dappert, A., Farquhar, A. (2009). Significance Is in the Eye of the Stakeholder. In: Agosti, M., Borbinha, J., Kapidakis, S., Papatheodorou, C., Tsakonas, G. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. ECDL 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5714. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04345-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04346-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)