Advertisement

Detecting and Correcting Errors in an English Tectogrammatical Annotation

  • Václav Klimeš
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5729)

Abstract

We present our first experiments with detecting and correcting errors in a manual annotation of English texts, taken from the Penn Treebank, at the dependency-based tectogrammatical layer, as it is defined in the Prague Dependency Treebank. The main idea is that errors in the annotation usually result in an inconsistency, i. e. the state when a phenomenon is annotated in different ways at several places in a corpus. We describe our algorithm for detecting inconsistencies (it got positive feedback from annotators) and we present some statistics on the manually corrected data and results of a tectogrammatical analyzer which uses these data for its operation. The corrections have improved the data just slightly so far, but we outline some ways to more significant improvement.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Marcus, M.P., Santorini, B., Marcinkiewicz, M.A.: Treebank-2, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, LDC Catalog No. LDC95T7 (1995), http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~treebank/
  2. 2.
    Hajič, J., et al.: Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0, Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, LDC Catalog No. LDC2006T01 (2006), http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/pdt2.0/
  3. 3.
    Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., Panevová, J.: The Meaning of a Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects Academia. Kluwer, Praha (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mikulová, M., et al.: Annotation on the tectogrammatical level in the Prague Dependency Treebank, ÚFAL Technical Report no. 2007/3.1, Charles University in Prague, Prague (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hajič, J., et al.: Prague English Dependency Treebank 1.0, Charles University in Prague, Prague (2009) (CD-ROM) ISBN 978-80-904175-0-2Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cinková, S., et al.: Annotation of English on the Tectogrammatical Level. ÚFAL Technical Report No. TR-2006-35, Charles University in Prague, Prague (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Žabokrtský, Z., Ptáček, J., Pajas, P.: TectoMT: Highly Modular MT System with Tectogrammatics Used as Transfer Layer. In: ACL 2008 WMT: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Association for Computational Linguistics, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 167–170 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dickinson, M.: Error detection and correction in annotated corpora. PhD thesis. The Ohio State University (2006), http://ling.osu.edu/~dickinso/papers/diss/
  9. 9.
    Štěpánek, J.: Závislostní zachycení větné struktury v anotovaném syntaktickém korpusu (nástroje pro zajištění konzistence dat) [Capturing a Sentence Structure by a Dependency Relation in an Annotated Syntactical Corpus (Tools Guaranteeing Data Consistence)], PhD thesis, Charles University in Prague (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klimeš, V.: Transformation-Based Tectogrammatical Dependency Analysis of English. In: Matoušek, V., Mautner, P. (eds.) Proceedings of Text, Speech and Dialogue 2007, pp. 15–22. Springer Science+Business Media Deutschland GmbH, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Václav Klimeš
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Formal and Applied LinguisticsCharles University in PragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations