An Extended Model for E-Discovery Operations
Most models created for electronic discovery (e-discovery) in legal proceedings tend to ignore the technical aspects mainly because they assume that only traditional digital forensic tasks are involved. However, this assumption is incorrect. The time frames for conducting e-discovery procedures are very restricted, and investigations are carried out in real time with strict non-disclosure dispositions and changing demands as the cases unfold. This paper presents an augmented model and architecture for e-discovery designed to cope with the technological complexities in real-world scenarios. It also discusses how e-discovery operations should be handled to ensure cooperation between digital forensic professionals and legal teams while guaranteeing that non-disclosure agreements and information confidentiality are preserved.
KeywordsElectronic discovery technical aspects non-disclosure
- 1.M. Daley and K. Rashbaum (Eds.), The Sedona Conference Framework for Analysis of Cross-Border Discovery Conflicts: A Practical Guide to Navigating the Competing Currents of International Data Privacy and e-Discovery – 2008 Public Comment Version, The Sedona Conference, Sedona, Arizona, 2008.Google Scholar
- 2.EDRM, Electronic Discovery Reference Model, St. Paul, Minnesota (www.edrm.net).Google Scholar
- 3.R. Losey, e-Discovery Team, Orlando, Florida (www.ralphlosey.wo rdpress.com).Google Scholar
- 4.R. McKemmish, What is forensic computing? Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 118 (www.aic.gov.au/publications /tandi/ti118.pdf), 2002.Google Scholar