Centralized versus Decentralized Information Systems

A Historical Flashback
  • Mats-Åke Hugoson
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 303)

Abstract

This paper brings into question whether information systems should be centralized or decentralized in order to provide greater support for different business processes. During the last century companies and organizations have used different approaches for centralization and decentralization; a simple answer to the question does not exist. This paper provides a survey of the evolution of centralized and decentralized approaches, mainly in a Nordic perspective. Based on critical reflections on the situation in the end of the century we can discuss what we can learn from history to achieve alignment between centralized and decentralized systems and the business structure. The conclusion is that theories, management and practice for decisions on centralization or decentralization of information systems must be improved. A conscious management and control of centralization /decentralization of IT support is a vital question in the company or the organization, and this is not a task that can be handled only by IT-specialists. There is a need for business oriented IT management of centralization/decentralization.

Keywords

Structures of information systems Systems interaction Independence between systems Centralization Distributed systems Decentralization 

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, B.R., Boynton, A.C.: Information Architecture. In: Search of Efficient Flexibility. MIS Quarterly/December (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacon, C.J.: Organizational Principles of Systems Decentralization. Journal of Information Technology 5 (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hugoson, M.-Å., Hesselmark, O., Grubbström, A.: MBI-metoden, en metod för verksamhetsanalys. Studentlitteratur, Lund (1983)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hugoson, M.-Å.: Verksamhetsbaserad systemstrukturering. NordData, Stockholm (1986)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iivari, J.: Levels of Abstraction as a Conceptual Framework for an Information system. In: Proceedings on the IFIP TC 8 /WG 8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems Concept. Namur, Belgium (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jardine, D.A., Yazid, S.: Integration of Information Submodels. In: Proceedings on the IFIP TC 8 /WG 8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems Concept. Namur, Belgium (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langefors, B.: Directive Information for Systems Control. In: The analysis of Business Systems, Glerup, Lund (1967)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Langefors, B.: System för företagsstyrning. Studentlitteratur, Lund (1968)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langefors, B.: Four Cases with Decentralized Management and Local Computers. Research report, Department of Computer Science, 82:09, Chalmers University of Technology & University of Gothenburg (1984)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Langefors, B.: Integrated versus Decentralized Information Resource Management. Research report, Department of Computer Science, 83:09, Chalmers University of Technology & University of Gothenburg 1984 (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langefors, B.: System development using Prototyping with Dataflex. Research report, Department of Computer Science, 84:03, Chalmers University of Technology & University of Gothenburg 1984 (1984)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langefors, B.: Essays on Infology. Studentlitteratur, Lund (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mumford, E.: Systems design for people, Economic evaluation of computer based systems. Book 3, the National Computer Center (NCC), Manchester (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mats-Åke Hugoson
    • 1
  1. 1.Jönköping International Business SchoolSweden

Personalised recommendations