Advertisement

Software Process Management Assessment Towards CMM a Systematic Approach to Optimize Internal Process Improvement

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 114)

Abstract

There are currently a number of holistic approaches available in relation to software process improvement. The search for new ideas and innovations to improve software development productivity and system quality continues to be a key focus of industrial and academic research. The CMM is a software process maturity model, which well known and most widely used model for Software Process Improvement (SPI). The SEI is continuing to evolve the CMM concepts, primarily in its current work on CMM integration, which addresses software, systems engineering, and integrated process and product development. This model attempts to quantify a software organization’s capability to consistently and predictably produce high-quality software products by involving process modeling, assessment, metrication, and technology transfer/ implementation to a greater or lesser extent. This paper provides a synthesis of prescriptions for successful software process improvement found from an extensive review of the quality management, organizational learning, and software process assessment process.

Keywords

Software software process improvement CMM assessment system engineering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wiles, A.D., Thompsona, D.G., Frantza, D.D.: Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johansson, C., Larsson, A., Larsson, T., Isaksson, O.: Gated Maturity Assessment: Supporting Gate Review Decisions with Knowledge Maturity Assessment. In: CIRP Design Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, C.S., Wang, M.H.: Ontology based computational intelligent multi agent and its application to CMMI assessment. Appl. Intell. 30, 203–219 (2009), doi:10.1007Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    von Wangenheim, C.G., Hauc, J.C.R., Trentin, G.: Experiences on establishing software processes in small companies. Information and Software Technology 48, 890 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mellado, D., Fernández-Medina, E., Piattini, M.: A common criteria based security requirements engineering process for the development of secure information systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces 29, 244–253 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tse, D.: Security in Modern Business: Security Assessment Model for Information Security Practices. In: Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library PACIS Proceedings Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), pp. 12–31 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitson, D.H., Masters, S.M.: An Analysis of SEI Software Process Assessment Results, pp. 1987–1991 (1993); 0270-5257/93 Q IEEEGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dunaway, D.K., Masters, S.: CMMSM -Based Appraisal for Internal Process Improvement (CBA IPI): Method Description, p. 15213. Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xattaneo, F., et al.: An Experience in Process Assessment. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1995), pp. 0270–5257. ACM (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuilboer, J.P., Ashrafi, N.: Software process and product improvement: an empirical assessment. Information and Software Technology 42, 27–34 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iversen, J., Nielsen, P.A., Nerbjerg, J.: Situated Assessment of Problems in Software Development. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 30(2) (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arent, J., et al.: Project Assessments: Supporting Commitment, Participation, and Learning in Software Process Improvement. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hopkinson, J.P., et al.: The Relationship Between the SSE-CMM and It Security Guidance Documentation. SSE-CMM and IT Security Guidance Documentation EWA-Canada Ltd. (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiegers, K.E., Sturzenberger, D.C.: A Modular Software Process Mini Assessment Method. IEEE Software, 0740–7459 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarshar, M., Finnemore, M., Haigh, R., Goulding, J.: SPICE: Is A Capability Maturity Model Applicable in the Construction Industry? Spice: A mature model, Institute for Research in Construction, Ottawa ON, K1A 0R6, Canada (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paulk, M.C.: Analyzing the Conceptual Relationship Between ISO/IEC 15504 (Software Process Assessment) and the Capability Maturity Model for Software, American Society for Quality (1999) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berry, M., Vandenbroek, M.F.: A Targeted Assessment of the Software Measurement Process, pp. 1530–1435. IEEE (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pikkarainen, M., Mäntyniemi, A.: An Approach for Using CMMI in Agile Software Development Assessments: Experiences from Three Case Studies. In: SPICE Conference, Luxemburg (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gebeyehu Belay G.
    • 1
  • Zhongshi He
    • 1
  • Dongsheng Zou
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Computer ScienceChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations