Skip to main content

The Role of Orthosis in Spinal Injury

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spine Trauma

Abstract

The management of spinal column fractures, especially when associated with spinal cord injury, was largely ignored until World War II when a spinal injury program at Stoke-Mandeville, England, was started under the direction of Sir Ludwig Guttman. Soldiers and civilians with fractured spines and most with paralysis were treated in an organized fashion commencing with postural reduction. The reduction was maintained by traction in the case of cervical injuries while the patient remained on a turning frame or padded bed until fracture stability or healing was achieved. Thoracic and lumbar fractures were reduced posturally, and the same type frame or bed was utilized until stabilization or healing was obtained (Figs. 5.1 and 5.2). In complex fractures, occasionally cervical-pelvic or cervical-femoral traction was required to achieve reduction (Table 5.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson LD (1971) Fractures. In: Chrenshaw AH (ed) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. C.V. Mosby, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apple D, Perez M (2006) Prospective study of orthotic use after operative stabilization of traumatic thoracic and lumbar fractures. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 12(2):77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Axelsson P, Johnson R, Stromqvist B (1993) Lumbar orthosis with unilateral hip immobilization. Spine 18:876–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bible JE, Biswas D, Nhang PG et al (2008) Postoperative bracing after spine surgery for degenerative conditions; a questionnaire study. Spine J 9(4):309–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchalter D, Kahanovitz N, Viola K et al (1989) Three dimensional spinal motion measurement. Part 2: non invasive assessment of lumbar brace immobilization of the spine. J Spinal Disord 1:284–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Butler JS, Walsh A, O’Byrne J (2005) Functional outcome of burst fractures of the first lumbar vertebra managed surgically and conservatively. Int Orthop 29:51–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cholewicki J, Kashif A, Silfies SP et al (2003) Comparison of motion restriction and trunk stiffness provided by three thoracolumbar orthosis (TLSO). J Spinal Disord Tech 16:461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davies WE, Morris JH, Hill V (1980) A Analysis of conservative (non-surgical) management of thoracolumbar fractures and fracture dislocations with neural damage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1324–1328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dickson JH, Harrington PR, Erwin WD (1978) Results of reduction and stabilization of the severely fractured thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bon Joint Surg Am 60:799–805

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferlic D (1962) The range of motion of the normal spine. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 2:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson RM, Hart DL, Simmons EF et al (1977) Cervical orthoses. A study company their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:332–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones RF, Snowdon E, Coan J et al (1987) Bracing of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Paraplegia 25:386–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koivikko MP, Myllynen P, Karjalainen M et al (2000) Conservative and operative treatment in cervical burst fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:448–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lantz SA, Schultz AB (1986) Lumbar spine orthosis weaving 1. Restriction of gross body motions. Spine 11:834–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller RA, Hardcastle P, Renwick SE (1992) Lower spinal mobility and external immobilization in the normal and pathologic condition. Orthop Rev 21:753–757

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mornis JM, Lucas DB, Bresler B (1961) Role of the trunk in stability of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 43:327–351

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nickel VL, Perry J, Garrett A et al (1960) Application of the halo. Orthop Prosthet App J 14:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  18. Norton PL, Brown T (1957) The Immobilizing efficiency of back braces; their effect on the posture and motion of the lambosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 39:111–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Plasmans FMW (1983) The effect of four types of support on the segmental mobility of the lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:943–947

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Razak M, Basir T, Hyzan Y et al (1998) Treatment in traumatic cervical spine injury. Med J Malaysia 53:1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seljeskog EL (1978) Non-operative management of acute upper cervical injuries. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 41:87–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vander Kooi D, Abad G, Basford JR et al (2003) Lumbar spine stabilization with a thoracolumbar sacral orthosis. Spine 29:100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vieweg U, Schultheib R (2001) A review of halo rest treatment of upper cervical spine injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:50–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yi L, Jingping B, Gele J (2008) Operative versus non-operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:1–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David F. Apple .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Apple, D.F., Brown, C., Hudson, L.M. (2010). The Role of Orthosis in Spinal Injury. In: Patel, V., Burger, E., Brown, C. (eds) Spine Trauma. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03694-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03694-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03693-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03694-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics