Advertisement

Abstract

A random walk on a graph is a process that explores the graph in a random way: at each step the walk is at a vertex of the graph, and at each step it moves to a uniformly selected neighbor of this vertex. Random walks are extremely useful in computer science and in other fields. A very natural problem that was recently raised by Alon, Avin, Koucky, Kozma, Lotker, and Tuttle (though it was implicit in several previous papers) is to analyze the behavior of k independent walks in comparison with the behavior of a single walk. In particular, Alon et al. showed that in various settings (e.g., for expander graphs), k random walks cover the graph (i.e., visit all its nodes), Ω(k)-times faster (in expectation) than a single walk. In other words, in such cases k random walks efficiently “parallelize” a single random walk. Alon et al. also demonstrated that, depending on the specific setting, this “speedup” can vary from logarithmic to exponential in k.

In this paper we initiate a more systematic study of multiple random walks. We give lower and upper bounds both on the cover time and on the hitting time (the time it takes to hit one specific node) of multiple random walks. Our study revolves over three alternatives for the starting vertices of the random walks: the worst starting vertices (those who maximize the hitting/cover time), the best starting vertices, and starting vertices selected from the stationary distribution. Among our results, we show that the speedup when starting the walks at the worst vertices cannot be too large - the hitting time cannot improve by more than an O(k) factor and the cover time cannot improve by more than min {k logn,k 2} (where n is the number of vertices). These results should be contrasted with the fact that there was no previously known upper-bound on the speedup and that the speedup can even be exponential in k for random starting vertices. Some of these results were independently obtained by Elsässer and Sauerwald (ICALP 2009). We further show that for k that is not too large (as a function of various parameters of the graph), the speedup in cover time is O(k) even for walks that start from the best vertices (those that minimize the cover time). As a rather surprising corollary of our theorems, we obtain a new bound which relates the cover time C and the mixing time mix of a graph. Specifically, we show that \(C=O(m \sqrt{\mathrm{mix}}\log ^2n)\) (where m is the number of edges).

Keywords

Markov Chains Random Walks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [AAK+07]
    Alon, N., Avin, C., Koucky, M., Kozma, G., Lotker, Z., Tuttle, M.R.: Many Random Walks Are Faster Than One. ArXiv e-prints 705 (May 2007), http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.0467
  2. [AF99]
    Aldous, D., Fill, J.: Reversible Markov Chains and Random Walks on Graphs (1999), http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/aldous/RWG/book.html
  3. [AKL+79]
    Aleliunas, R., Karp, R.M., Lipton, R.J., Lovász, L., Rackoff, C.: Random walks, universal traversal sequences, and the complexity of maze problems. In: 20th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), San Juan, Puerto Rico, October 29-31, 1979, pp. 218–223. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [AKS87]
    Ajtai, M., Komlós, J., Szemerédi, E.: Deterministic simulation in LOGSPACE. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), New York City, May 25-27, 1987, pp. 132–140 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. [BF93]
    Barnes, G., Feige, U.: Short random walks on graphs. In: STOC, pp. 728–737 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. [BK88]
    Broder, A.Z., Karlin, A.R.: Bounds on the cover time. Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 479–487 (1988)Google Scholar
  7. [BKRU89]
    Broder, A.Z., Karlin, A.R., Raghavan, P., Upfal, E.: Trading space for time in undirected s-t connectivity. In: STOC, pp. 543–549 (1989)Google Scholar
  8. [CCR09]
    Frieze, A., Cooper, C., Radzik, T.: Multiple random walks in random regular graphs. In: ICALP (2009)Google Scholar
  9. [CRRS89]
    Chandra, A.K., Raghavan, P., Ruzzo, W.L., Smolensky, R.: The electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times. In: STOC 1989: Proceedings of the twenty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 574–586. ACM, New York (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [ES09]
    Elsässer, R., Sauerwald, T.: Tight bounds for the cover time of multiple random walks. In: ICALP (2009)Google Scholar
  11. [Fei97]
    Feige, U.: A spectrum of time-space trade-offs for undirected s-t connectivity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 54(2), 305–316 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [HZ96]
    Halperin, S., Zwick, U.: An optimal randomised logarithmic time connectivity algorithm for the erew pram. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 53(3), 395–416 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [KNP99]
    Karger, D.R., Nisan, N., Parnas, M.: Fast connected components algorithms for the EREW PRAM. SIAM J. Comput. 28(3), 1021–1034 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [Lov96]
    Lovász, L.: Random walks on graphs: A survey. Combinatorics, Paul Erdos is Eighty 2, 353–398 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. [LWP]
    Levin, D.A., Wilmer, E., Peres, Y.: Markov Chains and Mixing Times. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  16. [Mat88]
    Matthews, P.: Covering problems for markov chains. The Annals of Probability 16(3), 1215–1228 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [Sin92]
    Sinclair, A.: Improved bounds for mixing rates of markov chains and multicommodity flow. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 1, 351–370 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klim Efremenko
    • 1
  • Omer Reingold
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Applied MathematicsThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations