Self-healing and Resilient Critical Infrastructures

  • Rune Gustavsson
  • Björn Ståhl
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5508)

Abstract

The paper describes methods and tools addressing self-healing and resilience of critical infrastructures, specifically power and information networks. Our case study is based on challenges addressed in the ongoing EU project INTEGRAL aiming at integrating DES/RES in cell-based virtual utilities. We propose two experimental environments, EXP II and INSPECT to support a structured approach in identifying, implementing and monitoring suitable self-healing mechanisms entailing an increasing system resilience in our systems. Our approach is based on own results from earlier EU projects and selected approaches from other international projects such as NSF GENI in the US and EU efforts such as SmartGrids and ARECI.

Keywords

self-healing resilience critial infrastructures interfaces experiments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdelwahed, S., Kandasamy, N., Neema, S.: A control-based framework for self-managing distributed computing systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT workshop on Self-managed systems, pp. 3–7. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradbury, J., Cordy, J., Dingel, B., Wermelinger, M.: A survey of self-management in dynamic software architecture specifications. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT workshop on Self-managed systems, pp. 28–33. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fontela Garcia, M.: Interaction des rseaux transport et de distribution en prsence de productions dcentralises. Thse pour obtenir le grade de Docteur de LINP Grenoble, de 10 juillet (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghosh, D., Sharman, R., Rao, R., Upadadhyaya, S.: Self-healing systems survey and synthesis. Decision Support Systems 42(4), 2164–2185 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goetz, E., Shenoi, S.: Critical Infrastructure Protection. IFIP. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gustavsson, R.: Ensuring Dependability in Service Oriented Computing. In: Proceedings of The 2006 International Conference on Security & Management (SAM 2006) at The 2006 World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Applied Computing (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gustavsson, R.: Sustainable Virtual Utilities Based on Microgrids. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Energy, Informatics and Cybernetics (EIC 2007), Best paper Award (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gustavsson, R.: Ensuring Quality of Service in Service Oriented Critical Infrastructures. In: Proceedings of The International Workshop on Complex Network and Infrastructure Protection (CNIP 2006). Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and the Environment (ENEA) (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gustavsson, R., Fredriksson, M.: Process Algebra as Support for Sustainable Systems of Services. In: Viroli, M., Omnicini, A. (eds.) Algebraic approaches for multi-agent systems. Special issue of Journal of Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing (AAECC), vol. 16, pp. 179–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knottenbelt, J., Clark, C.: Contract Related Agents. In: Toni, F., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3900, pp. 226–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koopman, P.: Elements of the Self-Healing System Problem Space. In: Proceedings of WADS 2003 Workshop on Software Architectures for Dependable Systems at ICSE 2003 International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, Oregon (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindh, J.-O.: On Observation of and Interaction in Open Distributed Systems. Doctoral Dissertation Series No. 2006:06. Blekinge Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mamei, M., Zambonelli, F.: Self-Maintaining Overlay Data Structures for Pervasive Automic Services. In: Keller, A., Martin-Flatin, J.-P. (eds.) SelfMan 2006. LNCS, vol. 3996, pp. 58–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mellstrand, P.: Informed System Protection. Doctoral Dissertation Series No. 2007:10. Blekinge Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mellstrand, P., Gustavsson, R.: Experiment Based Validation of CIIP. In: López, J. (ed.) CRITIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4347, pp. 15–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I.: Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems (Chaps. III and IV). J. Wiley and Sons, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park, J., Yoo, G., Lee, E.: Proactive Self-Healing Systems based on Multi-Agent Technologies. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Third ACIS Inyernational Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA 2006). IEEE, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tranchita, C.: Risk Assessment for Power System Security with Regard to Intentional Event. Thesis LInstitut Polytechnique de Grenoble (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Warmer, C., Kamphuis, R., Mellstrand, P., Gustavsson, R.: Distributed Control in Electricity Infrastructure. In: Proceedings International Conference of Future Power Systems, pp. 1–7, ISBN: 90-78205-02-4INSPEC Accession Number: 9045591Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    CIGRE WG 38-03: Power Systems Security Assessment: A Position Paper. CIGRE Electra, No. 175, December 1997, pp. 53–77 (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weys, D., Haesevoets, R., Eylen, B., Helleboogh, A., Holvoet, T., Joosen, W.: Endogenous versus exogenous self-management. In: Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on software engineering for adaptive and self-managing systems, pp. 41–48 (2008) ISBN: 978-1-60568-037-1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rune Gustavsson
    • 1
  • Björn Ståhl
    • 1
  1. 1.Blekinge Institute of TechnologySweden

Personalised recommendations