Energy-Constrained Scheduling of DAGs on Multi-core Processors

  • Ishfaq Ahmad
  • Roman Arora
  • Derek White
  • Vangelis Metsis
  • Rebecca Ingram
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 40)

Abstract

This paper proposes a technique to minimize the makespan of DAGs under energy constraints on multi-core processors that often need to operate under strict energy constraints. Most of the existing work aims to reduce energy subject to performance constraints. Thus, our work is in contrast to these techniques, and it is useful because one can encounter numerous energy-constraint scenarios in real life. The algorithm, named Incremental Static Voltage Adaptation (ISVA), uses the Dynamic Voltage Scaling technique and assigns differential voltages to each sub-task to minimize energy requirements of an application. Essentially, ISVA is a framework, rather than yet another DAG scheduling algorithm, in that it can work with any efficient algorithm to generate the initial schedule under no energy constraints. Given the initial schedule, ISVA efficiently identifies tasks’ relative importance and their liabilities on energy. It then achieves the best possible new schedule by observing its energy budget. The algorithm marginally degrades the schedule length with extensive reduction in energy budgets.

Keywords

Parallel processing multi-cores scheduling energy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad, I., Khan, S.U., Ranka, S.: Using Game Theory for Scheduling Tasks on Multi-Core Processors for Simultaneous Optimization of Performance and Energy. In: Workshop on NSF Next Generation Software Program in conjunction with the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2008), Miami, FL (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aydin, H., Melhem, R., Moss, D., Meja-Alvarez, P.: Power-Aware Scheduling for Periodic Real-Time Tasks. IEEE Trans. on Computers 53(5), 584–600 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burd, D., Pering, T.A., Stratakos, A.J., Brodersen, R.W.: Dynamic Voltage Scaled Microprocessor System. IEEE J. of Solid-State Circuits 35(11), 1571–1580, 473–484 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gutnik, V., Chandrakasan, A.: An Efficient Controller for Variable Supply-Voltage Low Power Processing. In: IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, pp. 158–159 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jejurikar, R., Gupta, R.: Dynamic Slack Reclamation with Procrastination Scheduling in Real-Time Embedded Systems. In: Design Automation Conf., pp. 111–116 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kang, J., Ranka, S.: Dynamic Algorithms for Energy Minimization on Parallel Machines. In: Euromicro Intl. Conf. on Parallel. Distributed and Network-based Processing (PDP 2008) (to appear, 2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan, S.U., Ahmad, I.: A Cooperative Game Theoretical Technique for Joint Optimization of Energy Consumption and Response Time in Computational Grids. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 20(3), 346–360 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kwok, Y.-K., Ahmad, I.: Dynamic Critical-Path Scheduling: An effective Technique for Allocating Task Graphs to Multiprocessors. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed. Systems 7(5) (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kwok, Y.-K., Ahmad, I.: Static Scheduling Algorithms for Allocating Directed Task Graphs to Multiprocessors. ACM Computing Surveys 31(4), 406–471 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luo, J., Jha, N.K.: Power-Conscious Joint Scheduling of Periodic Task Graphs and Aperiodic Tasks in Distributed Real-time Embedded Systems. In: Int. Conf. on Computer-Aided Design, pp. 357–364 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luo, J., Jha, N.K.: Static and Dynamic Variable Voltage Scheduling Algorithms for Real-time Heterogeneous Distributed Embedded Systems. In: ASP-DAC 2002: Proceedings of the 2002 conference on Asia South Pacific Design Automation/VLSI Design, p. 719. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmitz, M.T., Al-Hashimi, B.M.: Considering Power Variations of DVS Processing Elements for Energy Minimisation in Distributed Systems. In: Int’l Sym. on System Synthesis, pp. 250–255 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmitz, M.T., Al-Hashimi, B.M.: Considering Power Variations of DVS Processing Elements for Energy Minimisation in Distributed Systems. In: Int’l Sym. on System Synthesis, pp. 250–255 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu, Y., Prasanna, V.K.: Power-Aware Resource Allocation for Independent Tasks in Heterogeneous Real-Time Systems. In: 9th IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, Y., Hu, X. (Sharon) ., Chen, D.Z.: Task Scheduling and Voltage Selection for Energy Minimization. In: Design Automation Conf., pp. 183–188 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu, D., Melhem, R., Childers, B.R.: Scheduling with Dynamic Voltage/Speed Adjustment Using Slack Reclamation in Multiprocessor Real-Time Systems. IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Systems 14(7), 686–700 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ishfaq Ahmad
    • 1
  • Roman Arora
    • 1
  • Derek White
    • 1
  • Vangelis Metsis
    • 1
  • Rebecca Ingram
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentTrinity UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations