Professional Presentation in Austrian E-Government

  • Arne Tauber
  • Thomas Rössler
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5693)


Mandates are a fundamental vehicle for carrying out public administration and are an indispensable requirement for conducting transactions on someone else’s behalf in legal or business matter. Austrian eGovernment initiatives have introduced electronic mandates early. However, a special case is the submission of professional representatives when conducting transactions on someone else’s behalf. In this paper we introduce a solution allowing professional representatives the representation of both natural persons and corporate bodies by means of complementing existing tools and technologies for adequate online identification and authentication.


e-Government Identification Mandates Professional Representation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    European Parliament and Council, Directive 1999/93/EC on a Community framework for electronic signaturesGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Austrian signature law: Bundesgesetz über elektronische Signaturen (Signaturgesetz – SigG), BGBL. I Nr. 190/1999, BGBL I Nr. 137/2000, BGBL. I Nr. 32/2001, BGBL. I Nr. 8/2008(in German) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Commission, Directorate General for Information Society and Media, The User Challenge Benchmarking The Supply of Online Public Services, 7th Measurement (September 2007) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Austrian E-Government Act: Federal Act on Provisions Facilitating Electronic Communications with Public Bodies. Art. 1 of the Act published in the Austrian Federal Law Gazette, part I, Nr. 10/2004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leitold, H., Hollosi, A., Posch, R.: Security Architecture of the Austrian Citizen Card Concept. In: Proceedings of 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eastlake, D., Reagle, J., Solo, D.: XML Signature Syntax and Processing, W3C Recommendation (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    European Committee for Standardization: Security Requirements for Secure Signature Creation Devices (SSCD-PP), CWA 14169 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cantor, S., Kemp, J., Philpott, R., Maler, E.: Assertions and Protocols for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0, OASIS Standard (March 15, 2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hollosi, A., Leitold, H., Rössler, T.: Object Identifier der öffentlichen Verwaltung (2007) (in German)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schamberger, R., Karlinger, G., Moser, L.: Spezifikationen Module für Online Applikationen – ID (2007) (in German)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rössler, T., Hollosi, A.: Elektronische Vollmachten Spezifikation 1.0.0 (2006) (in German)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scheuchl, A.: MOA-VV Spezifikation Version 0.9.9 (2005) (in German)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tauber, A.: Stammzahlenregister Gateway (sourcePIN register gateway) – Spezifikation, Version 1.0.0 (2008) (in German)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne Tauber
    • 1
  • Thomas Rössler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Applied Information Processing and CommunicationsGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations