Advertisement

IT Enabled Risk Management for Taxation and Customs: The Case of AEO Assessment in the Netherlands

  • Jianwei Liu
  • Yao-Hua Tan
  • Joris Hulstijn
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5693)

Abstract

Building collaborative relationships with trusted businesses is a long-term strategy for EU governments. Recently, for the EU Tax and Customs Administration (TCA), the realization of this goal has become more visible with the emerging concept of the Authorized Economic Operator (AEO). Businesses in the member states can apply for the AEO certificate. When it is being granted, simplified control procedures and trade facilitation will be provided by the TCA. A possible “win-win situation” can be achieved, with increased trade efficiency and lowered administrative burden. However, without proper selection of trusted business partners, governments may be worse off due to the adverse selection problem caused by information asymmetry. In this paper, we analyze the cause and effect of the adverse selection in the Government-to-Business relationship building. Further, we show that an IT enabled risk assessment approach can effectively eliminate the G2B information asymmetry and solve the adverse selection problem. The AEO assessment approach of DutchTCA is analysed to give a real life application on how IT is enabling the general risk management approach of the DutchTCA.

Keywords

G2B relationship building adverse selection risk management AEO 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    EU Commission: Authorised economic operators—guidelines. Risk Management, Security and specific controls.DG Taxtion and Customs Union, Brussels (June 29, 2007), http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/customs/policy_issues/customs_security/AEO_guidelines_en.pdf
  2. 2.
    Akerlof, G.A.: The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488–500 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spence, M.: Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, 355–374 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.: Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, 629–649 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Varian, H.R.: Intermediate microeconomics: a modern approach. WW Norton & Co., New York (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu, J., Tan, Y.-H.: Moral hazard and G2B control procedures redesign. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DG.O 2008), Montreal, Canada. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 289, pp. 421–422 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    EU Parliament: Amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code. Official Journal of the European Union L 117/13 648/2005 (2005) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Reilly, C.A.: The use of information in organizational decision making: A model and some propositions. Research in Organizational Behavior 5, 103–139 (1983)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feldman, M.S., March, J.G.: Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26, 171–186 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gertner, R., Gibbons, R., Scharfstein, D.: Simultaneous Signalling to the Capital and Product Markets. The RAND Journal of Economics 19, 173–190 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    EU commission (Fiscalis Risk Analysis Project Group): Risk Management Guide for tax administrations (2006), http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/tax_cooperation/gen_overview/Risk_Management_Guide_for_tax_administrations_en.pdf
  14. 14.
    Gutierrez, X., Hintsa, J.: Voluntary Supply Chain Security Programs: A Systematic Comparison. In: The International Conference on Information Systems, Logistics and Supply Chain, Lyon, France, May 15-17 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davenport, T.H., Brooks, J.D.: Enterprise systems and the supply chain. The Journal of Enterprise Information Management 17, 8–19 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    EU Commission: Authorised economic operators: The AEO COMPACT model. DG Taxtion and Customs Union. In: Directorate-General, T.A.C.U. (ed.), vol. TAXUD/2006/1452. Brussels (June 13, 2006), http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/customs/policy_issues/customs_security/AEO_compact_model_en.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianwei Liu
    • 1
  • Yao-Hua Tan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joris Hulstijn
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Information Systems GroupVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Dept. of Technology, Policy and ManagementTechnical University DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations