IT Enabled Risk Management for Taxation and Customs: The Case of AEO Assessment in the Netherlands
Building collaborative relationships with trusted businesses is a long-term strategy for EU governments. Recently, for the EU Tax and Customs Administration (TCA), the realization of this goal has become more visible with the emerging concept of the Authorized Economic Operator (AEO). Businesses in the member states can apply for the AEO certificate. When it is being granted, simplified control procedures and trade facilitation will be provided by the TCA. A possible “win-win situation” can be achieved, with increased trade efficiency and lowered administrative burden. However, without proper selection of trusted business partners, governments may be worse off due to the adverse selection problem caused by information asymmetry. In this paper, we analyze the cause and effect of the adverse selection in the Government-to-Business relationship building. Further, we show that an IT enabled risk assessment approach can effectively eliminate the G2B information asymmetry and solve the adverse selection problem. The AEO assessment approach of DutchTCA is analysed to give a real life application on how IT is enabling the general risk management approach of the DutchTCA.
KeywordsG2B relationship building adverse selection risk management AEO
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.EU Commission: Authorised economic operators—guidelines. Risk Management, Security and specific controls.DG Taxtion and Customs Union, Brussels (June 29, 2007), http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/customs/policy_issues/customs_security/AEO_guidelines_en.pdf
- 5.Varian, H.R.: Intermediate microeconomics: a modern approach. WW Norton & Co., New York (2002)Google Scholar
- 6.Liu, J., Tan, Y.-H.: Moral hazard and G2B control procedures redesign. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DG.O 2008), Montreal, Canada. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 289, pp. 421–422 (2008)Google Scholar
- 7.EU Parliament: Amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code. Official Journal of the European Union L 117/13 648/2005 (2005) Google Scholar
- 8.O’Reilly, C.A.: The use of information in organizational decision making: A model and some propositions. Research in Organizational Behavior 5, 103–139 (1983)Google Scholar
- 11.Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
- 12.Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.EU commission (Fiscalis Risk Analysis Project Group): Risk Management Guide for tax administrations (2006), http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/tax_cooperation/gen_overview/Risk_Management_Guide_for_tax_administrations_en.pdf
- 14.Gutierrez, X., Hintsa, J.: Voluntary Supply Chain Security Programs: A Systematic Comparison. In: The International Conference on Information Systems, Logistics and Supply Chain, Lyon, France, May 15-17 (2006)Google Scholar
- 16.EU Commission: Authorised economic operators: The AEO COMPACT model. DG Taxtion and Customs Union. In: Directorate-General, T.A.C.U. (ed.), vol. TAXUD/2006/1452. Brussels (June 13, 2006), http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/customs/policy_issues/customs_security/AEO_compact_model_en.pdf