Advertisement

Democratizing Process Innovation? On Citizen Involvement in Public Sector BPM

  • Björn Niehaves
  • Robert Malsch
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5693)

Abstract

‘Open Innovation’ has been heavily discussed for product innovations; however, an information systems (IS) perspective on ‘process innovation’ has not yet been taken. Analyzing the example of the public sector in Germany, the paper seeks to investigate the factors that hinder and support ‘open process innovation’, a concept we define as the involvement of citizens in business process management (BPM) activities. With the help of a quantitative study (n=358), six factors are examined for their impact on citizen involvement in local government BPM initiatives. The results show that citizen involvement in reform processes is not primarily motivated by the aim of cost reduction, but rather related to legitimacy reasons and the intent to increase employee motivation. Based on these findings, implications for (design) theory and practice are discussed: Instead of detailed collaborative business processes modeling, the key of citizen involvement in public sector BPM lies in communication and mutual understanding.

Keywords

Business Process Management Public Sector Quantitative Study Empirical Study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G.: Public Management Reform – A Comparative Analysis, Oxford, UK (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lenk, K.: Der Staat am Draht. Electronic Government und die Zukunft der öffentlichen Verwaltung. Edition sigma, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asgarkhani, M.: Digital Government and its Effectiveness in Public Management Reform: A Local Government Perspective. Public Management Review 7, 465–487 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ridder, H.-G., Bruns, H.-J., Spier, F.: Analysis of Public Management Change Processes: The Case of Local Government Accounting Reforms in Germany. Public Administration 83, 443–471 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reichard, C.: Local Public Management Reforms in Germany. Public Administration 81, 345–363 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pratchett, L.: Technological Bias in an Information Age: ICT Policy Making in Local Government. In: Public Administration in an Information Age, pp. 207–221. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wollmann, H.: Local Government Modernization in Germany: Between Incrementalism and Reform Waves. Public Administration 78, 915–936 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niehaves, B.: Verwaltungsreform in Deutschland und Japan - Kooperative Kommunale Reformpolitik im Vergleich. Dissertation der Philosophischen Fakultät, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zairi, M.: Business Process Management: A Boundaryless Approach to Modern Competitiveness. Business Process Management Journal 3, 64–80 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scheer, A.-W.: Heilige Kühe schlachten. move Moderne Verwaltung. 2003/11, pp. 26–28 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Breyfogle, F.W.: Leveraging Business Process Management and Six Sigma in Process Improvement Initiatives. Smarter Solutions (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Behjat, S.: Prozessmanagement in der Verwaltung. VDM Müller, Saarbrücken (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosemann, M., de Bruin, T., Power, B.: A Model to Measure Business Process Management Maturity and Improve Performance. In: Business process management: practical guidelines to successful implementations, pp. 299–315. Burlington (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lenk, K., Traunmüller, R., Wimmer, M.: Electronic Business Invading the Public Sector: Considerations on Change and Design. In: 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gassmann, O., Enkel, E.: Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. In: R&D Management Conference (RADMA), R&D Management Conference (RADMA) (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolf, P., Krcmar, H.: Collaborative E-Government. move Moderne Verwaltung. 2007/5, pp. 12–15 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lipset, S.M.: Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review 53, 69–105 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bock, S.: “City 2030” – 21 Cities in Quest of the Future: New Forms of Urban and Regional Governance. European Planning Studies 14, 321–334 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones, M.: Policy Legitimation, Expert Advice, and Objectivity: ‘Opening’ the UK Governance Framework for Human Genetics. Social Epistemology 18, 247–270 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Héritier, A.: Composite democracy in Europe: the role of transparency and access to information. Journal of European Public Policy 10, 814–833 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    King, C.S., Feltey, K.M., O’Neill Susel, B.: The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 58, 317–326 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frost, A.: Restoring Faith in Government: Transparency Reform in the United States and the European Union. European Public Law 9, 87–104 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maslow, A.H.: A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review 50, 370–396 (1943)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geen, R.G.: Human motivation: A social psychological approach, 1st edn. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont (1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bénabou, R., Tirole, J.: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Review of Economic Studies 70, 489–520 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mintzberg, H.: The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps For Strategy. California Management Review 30, 11–24 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lane, J.-E.: Public sector reform: only deregulation, privatization and marketization? In: Public Sector Reform: Rationale, Trends and Problems, pp. 1–16. Sage, London (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Devine, E.J.: Manpower Shortages in Local Government Employment. American Economic Review 59, 538–545 (1969)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gregor, S.: Design Theory in Information Systems. Australian Journal of Information Systems 10, 14–22 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn Niehaves
    • 1
  • Robert Malsch
    • 1
  1. 1.European Research Center for Information SystemsMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations