Advertisement

Process-Based Governance in Public Administrations Using Activity-Based Costing

  • Jörg Becker
  • Philipp Bergener
  • Michael Räckers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5693)

Abstract

Decision- and policy-makers in public administrations currently lack on missing relevant information for sufficient governance. In Germany the introduction of New Public Management and double-entry accounting enable public administrations to get the opportunity to use cost-centered accounting mechanisms to establish new governance mechanisms. Process modelling in this case can be a useful instrument to help the public administrations decision- and policy-makers to structure their activities and capture relevant information. In combination with approaches like Activity-Based Costing, higher management level can be supported with a reasonable data base for fruitful and reasonable governance approaches. Therefore, the aim of this article is combining the public sector domain specific process modelling method PICTURE and concept of activity-based costing for supporting Public Administrations in process-based Governance.

Keywords

E-Government Domain Specific Process Modelling PICTURE Activity-Based Costing Process-Based Governance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Janssen, M.: Modeling for Accountability: The Case of the Virtual Business Counter. In: Proc. 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2005), pp. 2021–2029 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Algermissen, L., Delfmann, P., Falk, T.: eGovernment Success Factors. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3183, pp. 503–506. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gronlund, A.: Electronic Government - Design, Applications and Management. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hood, C.: The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20, 93–109 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson, A., Lapsley, I.: The diffusion of accounting practices in the new "managerial" public sector. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 16, 359–372 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown, R.E., Myring, M.J., Gard, C.G.: Activity-Based Costing in Government: Possibilities and Pitfalls. Public Budgeting and Finance 19, 3–21 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tatsiopoulos, I.P., Panayioto, N.: The integration of activity based costing and enterprise modeling for reengineering purposes. International Journal of Production Economics 66, 33–44 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tornberg, K., Jämsen, M., Parakno, J.: Activity-based costing and process modeling for cost-conscious product design: A case study in a manufacturing company. International Journal of Production Economics 79, 75–82 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Algermissen, L., Delfmann, P., Niehaves, B.: Experiences in Process-oriented Reorganisation through Reference Modelling in Public Administrations - The Case Study Regio@KomM. In: Proc. 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS - Business Process Modeling, 3rd edn. Springer Publishing, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Object Management Group. Business Process Modeling Notation, V1.1., http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/BPMN%201-1%20Specification.pdf
  12. 12.
    Becker, J., Algermissen, L., Falk, T.: Prozessorientierte Verwaltungsmodernisierung - Prozessmanagement im Zeitalter von E-Government und New Public Management. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pfeiffer, D.: Semantic Business Process Analysis - Building Block-based Construction of Automatically Analyzable Business Process Models. Münster (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Babad, Y.M., Balachandran, B.V.: Cost driver optimization in activity-based costing. The Accounting Review 68, 563–564 (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cokins, G., Stratton, A., Helbling, J.: An ABC manager’s primer. Irwin Publishing, Chicago (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gupta, M., Galloway, K.: Activity-based costing/management and its implications for operations management. Technovation 23, 131–138 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruhl, J.M., Hartman, B.P.: Activity-Based Costing in the Service Sector. Advances in Management Accounting, 147–161 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    KGSt: Kosten eines Arbeitsplatzes (Stand 2007/2008). Kommunale Gemeinschaftsstelle für Verwaltungsmanagement, Cologne, Germany (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Green, P.F., Rosemann, M.: Integrated Process Modeling: An Ontological Evaluation. Information Systems 25, 73–87 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shanks, G., Tansley, E., Weber, R.: Using ontology to validate conceptual models. Communications of the ACM 46, 85–89 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guizzardi, G., Pires, L.F., Sinderen, M.J.v.: On the role of Domain Ontologies in the design of Domain-Specific Visual Modeling Languages. In: Proc. 2nd Workshop on Domain-Specific Visual Languages, 17th ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA 2002) (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luoma, J., Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.-P.: Defining Domain-Specific Modeling Languages - Collected Experiences. In: Proc. 4th Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling (OOPSLA 2004) (2004) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    van Deursen, A., Klint, P., Visser, J.: Domain-Specific Languages: An Annotated Bibliography. SIGPLAN Notices 35, 26–36 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Becker, J., Bergener, P., Kleist, S., Pfeiffer, D., Räckers, M.: Model-based Evaluation of ICT Investments in Public Administrations. In: Proc. 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2008), pp. 1–10 (2008) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Becker, J., Pfeiffer, D., Räckers, M.: Domain Specific Process Modelling in Public Administrations – The PICTURE-Approach. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, J., Grönlund, Å. (eds.) EGOV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4656, pp. 68–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mayer, R.: Prozesskostenrechnung - State of the Art. In: GmbH, H.P. (ed.) Prozesskostenmanagement, pp. 3–27. Franz Vahlen (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anderson, S.R., Kaplan, R.S.: Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Harvard Business Review 82 (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cooper, R., Kaplan, R.S.: Measure Cost Right: Make the Right Decision. Harvard Business Review 66, 96–105 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Becker
    • 1
  • Philipp Bergener
    • 1
  • Michael Räckers
    • 1
  1. 1.European Research Center for Information SystemsUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations