Issuers’ Commitments Would Add More Value than Any Rating Scheme Could Ever Do

  • Carlos Veiga
  • Uwe Wystup


This paper analyzes the evolution of the structured products market focusing on the tools available for private investors, on which they rely for the selection process. The selection process is extremely difficult because there is a myriad of products, because of the dynamic nature of the market and market participants’ actions, and because of the complexity of many of the products. We consider the existing types of tools, in particular the rating schemes that have been proposed by industry participants to provide guidance to the investor. We propose a set of properties that a rating scheme should show and check whether the existing schemes carry these properties. Our findings suggest that the existing rating schemes do not carry the desired properties. Furthermore, for the purpose of solving a highly indefinite selection process, an effective rating scheme may not exist. In light of this, we propose the introduction of a new quantity, the floor, that has a legal and financial meaning, on which issuers can also compete in addition to price and spread. Its acceptance and use would also yield standardization towards investors’ interests by excluding some pricing practices and severely limiting others. Even though very little research has been produced in this area, we believe this to be a topic of high importance in establishing guidelines for healthy industry development and regulation that upholds investors’ interests.


Structure Product Rating Scheme Credit Rating Reference Price Price Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ahlert, M., Gubernatis, G., Kliemt, H.: Kidney allocation in Eurotransplant. Anal. Krit. 23, 156–172 (2001) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cabral, L.: Introduction to Industrial Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luce, R., Krantz, D., Suppes, P., Tversky, A.: Foundations of Measurement, vol. III. Academic Press, San Diego (1990) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stoimenov, P., Wilkens, S.: Are structured products ‘fairly’ priced? An analysis of the German market for equity-linked instruments. J. Bank. Finance 29, 2971–2993 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilkens, S., Erner, C., Röder, K.: The pricing of structured products in Germany. J. Deriv., Fall, 55–69 (2003) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilkens, S., Stoimenov, P.: The pricing of leverage products: An empirical investigation of the German market for ‘long’ and ‘short’ stock index certificates. J. Bank. Finance 31, 735–750 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Frankfurt School of Finance & ManagementFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations