Skip to main content

Walkability as a Summary Measure in a Spatially Autoregressive Mode Choice Model: An Instrumental Variable Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress in Spatial Analysis

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

In recent years it has become more common to include social interactions or neighborhood effects (also called social network effects) in transportation modeling. These models are typically in the tradition of Brock and Durlauf (2001, 2002) who were among the first to propose a discrete choice model that includes social interactions and neighborhood effects. However, their approach is inherently non-spatial, while the topology of social interactions and neighborhood effects can be best captured spatially (Leenders 2002; Páez et al. 2008a). Therefore, some of the latest articles in transportation modeling have moved towards explicitly incorporating the spatially autoregressive structure of social network effects into their models (e.g. Dugundi and Walker 2005; Páez and Scott 2007; Goetzke 2008). This new direction in transportation research is not all that surprising, given the success of spatial econometrics as an emerging modeling method across social science disciplines. The econometric strategy to implement an independent variable representing social interactions and neighborhood effects, as proposed by Brock and Durlauf (2001, 2002), is to use the group mean of the observed dependent choice variable, as defined by social interactions and neighborhood effects. This approach can be spatially extended if the group mean is based on spatial relations, as in traffic analysis zones (Dugundi and Walker 2005), a spatial weight matrix (Goetzke 2008), or a matrix based on personal relations (Páez and Scott 2007). Therefore, choices could be modeled as a function of the typical choice determinants in travel behavior analysis (e.g. personal, household, trip and mode characteristics), or as choices of either a non-spatial group or spatial neighbors. Empirical work dealing with mode choice decisions by Dugundi and Walker (2005), and Goetzke (2008) give evidence that the mode choice decisions of spatial neighbors are indeed associated with the mode choice decision of the individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluver, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock WA, Durlauf SN (2001) Discrete choice with social interactions. Rev Econ Stud 66:235–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock WA, Durlauf SN (2002) A multinomial-choice model with neighborhood effects. Am Econ Rev 92:298–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK, Largey AG (2006) Social interaction and urban sprawl. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1843, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugundi ER, Walker JL (2005) Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies. Transp Res Rec 1921:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans WN, Oates WE, Schwab RM (1992) Measuring peer group effects: a study of teenage behavior. J Polit Econ 100:966–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming MM (2004) Techniques for estimating spatially dependent discrete choice models. In: Anselin L et al. (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 145–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzke F (2003) Are travel demand forecasting models biased because of uncorrected spatial autocorrelation? Regional Research Institute Research Paper 2003–10, West Virginia University, Morgantown

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzke F (2008) Network effects in public transit use: evidence from a spatially autoregressive mode choice model for New York. Urban Stud 45:407–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Land KC, Deane G (1992) On the large-sample estimation of regression models with spatial or network effects terms: a two-stage least squares approach. Sociol Methodol 22:221–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenders RTAJ (2002) Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing a weight matrix. Soc Networks 24:21–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski CF (2000) Economic analysis of social interactions. J Eco Perspect 14:115–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic, New York, pp 105–162

    Google Scholar 

  • NYMTC (2004) New York best practice model (BPM) for regional travel demand forecasting. Technical report, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Páez A, Scott DM (2007) Social influence on travel behavior: a simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environ Plann A 39:647–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Páez A, Scott DM, Volz E (2008a) Weight matrices for social influence analysis: an investigation of measurement errors and their effect on model identification and estimation quality. Soc Networks 30:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Páez A, Scott DM, Volz E (2008b) A discrete choice approach to modeling social influence on individual decision making. Environ Plann B 35:1055–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2005) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western College Publishing, Florence, KY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Goetzke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goetzke, F., Andrade, P.M. (2010). Walkability as a Summary Measure in a Spatially Autoregressive Mode Choice Model: An Instrumental Variable Approach. In: Páez, A., Gallo, J., Buliung, R., Dall'erba, S. (eds) Progress in Spatial Analysis. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03326-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics