Skip to main content

Analysing Decision Mechanisms for Natural Hazard Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Natural Hazard Management in Alpine Environments

Abstract

The traditional economic approach to natural hazard management follows the idea of internalizing external effects of the public good, so-called “protective measures”. From an economic perspective protective measures can be classified as a public good. Such a good is characterized by non-rivalry, meaning that public goods are those for which consumption by one individual does not detract from the ability of others to consume them. Furthermore, it is characterized by non-exclusivity, in other words by indivisibility (‘all or nothing’ provision) and collective consumption (individuals cannot be excluded from consumption) (Edwards-Jones et al. 2000). In contrast to private goods, there is no market which takes over the decision process for the allocation of the goods. This so-called market failure is compensated by the state taking over the decision responsibility, whereby a choice has to be made how to decide collectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bauer, C (1986) Nutzen-Kosten-Untersuchungen – Fruchtbringende Entscheidungshilfen oder Tarnkappen für politische Willkür? Der Öffentliche Sektor 11(1), pp 36-48

    Google Scholar 

  • Belton V, Vickers, S (1990) Use of simple Multi-Attribute Value Function incorporating visual interactive sensitivity analysis for Multiple Criteria Decision Making. In: Bana e Costa, CA (ed). Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Berlin, Springer, pp 320-334

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankart, CB (2006) Öffentliche Finanzen in der Demokratie: Eine Einführung in die Finanzwissenschaft, 6th edition, Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, AE, Greenberg, DH, Vining, AR, Weimer, DL (2001) Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonus, H (1996) Institutionen und Institutionelle Ökonomik: Anwendungen für die Umweltpolitik. In: Gawel, E. (ed) Institutionelle Probleme der Umweltpolitik, Zeitschrift für Angewandte Umweltforschung, Sonderheft 8. Berlin, pp 26-41

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM, Tullock, G (1962) The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, JM (1991a) Constitutional Economics, IEA masters of modern economics, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, JM (1991b) The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order, Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, RH (1988) The Firm, the Market and the Law, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi B, Funtowicz SO, Lo Casciao S, Munda, G (2000) Combining Participative and Institutional Approaches with Multicriteria Evaluation. An Empirical Study for Water Issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics 34, pp 267-282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogson J, Spackmann M, Pearman A, Philips, L (2001) Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Manual. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Jones G, Davies B, Hussain S (2000) Ecological Economics. An Introduction, Blackwell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fandel G, Spronk J (1983) Multiple Criteria-Decision Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, BS (1990) Ökonomie ist Sozialwissenschaft, Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Kirchgässner G (2002) Demokratische Wirtschaftspolitik. Theorie und Anwendung, 3rd edition, Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey BS, Stutzer A (2007) Should National Happiness be Maximized? Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zürich, Working Paper No. 306

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch M, Wein T, Ewers HJ (2007) Marktversagen und Wirtschaftspolitik, 7th edition, Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamper CD (2004) Building Energy Scenarios for Eastern Styria (Austria) using Multi Criteria Mapping with the Inclusion of Participatory Methods. Master of Science Thesis, University of Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamper C (2005) Can Public Participation Lead to an Increase in Efficiency and Effectiveness of Decision Making? A Preliminary Assessment of the Relevant Concepts. alpS Working Paper Series, WP 06-05

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamper C, Thöni M, Weck-Hannemann H (2006) A Conceptual Approach to the Use of Cost-Benefit and Multi Criteria Analysis in Natural Hazard Management. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 6, pp 293-302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Spash CJ (1993) Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansjürgens B (2004) Economic Valuation through Cost-Benefit Analysis – Possibilities and Limitations. Toxicology 205, pp 241-252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanusch H (1987) Nutzen-Kosten-Analyse, Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society on MCDM (2004) International Society on Multi-Criteria Decision Making http://www.terry.uga.edu/mcdm/ (accessed date 17.6.2004)

  • Kirchgässner G (1991) Homo oeconomicus, Mohr/Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner-Frey E (2004) Öffentliche Güter im individuellen Entscheidungskalkül. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen verschiedener Präferenzenthüllungsverfahren, Dr. Kovač, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter A, Thöni M, Weck-Hannemann H (2007) Protective Measures against Avanlanches – Are they Worth their Costs? (forthcoming in this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller D (1996) Constitutional Democracy, Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (1995) Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment. Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics, Physica, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1969) The Principle of ‘Fiscal Equivalence’: The Division of Responsibilities Among Different Levels of Government, American Economic Review 59, pp 479-487

    Google Scholar 

  • Omann I (2004) Multi-Criteria Decision Aid as an Approach for Sustainable Development Analysis and Implementation, PhD Thesis, Karl-Franzens University Graz, Graz

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappenheim R (2000) Neue Institutionenökonomik und politische Institutionen, Peter Lang, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschky PA, Weck-Hannemann H (2006) El ”riesgo de caridad”: Análisis económico de la ayuda gubernamental tras las catástrofes naturales.Gerencia de riesgos y seguros 93, pp 17-31

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschky PA, Weck-Hannemann H (2007a) Charity Hazard – a Real Hazard to Natural Disaster Insurance? Environmental Hazards (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschky PA, Weck-Hannemann H (2007b) Vor- oder Nachsorge? Ökonomische Perspektiven. In: Glade T, Felgentreff C (eds) Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen, Elsevier, Heidelberg (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter R, Furubotn EG (2003) Neue Institutionenökonomik, 3rd edition, Mohr Siebeck, Tuebingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze R, Wagner G (2004) In the Aftermath of Dresden: New Directions in German Flood Insurance, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 29(2), pp 154-168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke P, Gassner M, Roy B (1989) Multicriteria Decision-Aid, Wiley & Sons, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Weck-Hannemann H (1994) Die politische Ökonomie der Umweltpolitik. In: Bartl R, Hackl F (eds) Einführung in die Umweltpolitik, Vahlen, Munich, pp 101-117

    Google Scholar 

  • Weck-Hannemann H (2006) The Efficiency of Protective Measures. In: Ammann, WJ, Dannemann S, Vulliet L (eds) Risk 21 - Coping with Risks due to Natural Hazards in the 21st Century, Taylor & Francis, London, pp 147-154

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gamper, C., Raschky, P., Weck-Hannemann, H. (2009). Analysing Decision Mechanisms for Natural Hazard Management. In: Veulliet, E., Johann, S., Weck-Hannemann, H. (eds) Sustainable Natural Hazard Management in Alpine Environments. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03229-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics