Skip to main content

The Blind Leading the Blind: A Third-Party Model for Bilateral Multi-issue Negotiations under Incomplete Information

  • Chapter
Advances in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 233))

Summary

We study a multi-issue negotiation problem where agents have private information concerning their preferences over the issues. The ignorance of agents regarding the actual solution space makes it difficult for them to come to an agreement that is both fair and efficient. To make such negotiations easier, we propose a framework that employs a third-party to act as a mediator that will guide agents towards equitable solutions on the efficient frontier. To achieve this, our mediator combines the declarations of agents into a coherent negotiation protocol that dampens the desire of agents to lie and encourages them to explore regions of the solution space that are efficient and profitable for both parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kraus, S.: Strategic negotiation in multiagent systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenschein, J., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gatti, N., Di Giunta, F., Marino, S.: Alternating-offers bargaining with one-sided uncertain deadlines: an efficient algorithm. Artificial Intelligence 172, 1119–1157 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Barry, J.: Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Articial Intelligence 172, 823–851 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: Bargaining and Markets. Academic Press, San Diego (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Multi-issue negotiation with deadlines. Artificial Intelligence Research 27, 381–417 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Klein, M., Faratin, P., Sayama, H., Bar-Yam, Y.: Negotiating complex contracts. IEEE Intelligent Systems 8(6), 32–38 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Myerson, R.B., Satterthwaite, M.A.: Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Economic Theory 29, 265–281 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Pratt, J.W., Zeckhauser, R.: Multidimensional bargains and the desirability of ex post inefficiency. Risk and Uncertainty 5, 205–216 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartal, Y., Gonen, R., Mura, P.L.: Negotiation-range mechanisms: Exploring the limits of truthful efficient markets. In: EC 2004: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 1–8 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nash, J.: The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18, 155–162 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber, T., Bapna, A.: Bayesian incentive compatible parameterization of mechanisms. Journal of Mathematical Economics 44(3-4), 394–403 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. John, R., Raith, M.G.: Strategic step-by-step negotiation. Economics 70(2), 127–154 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. John, R., Raith, M.G.: Optimizing multi-stage negotiations. Economic Behavior and Organization 45(2), 155–173 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fershtman, C.: The importance of the agenda in bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior 2, 224–238 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shew, J., Larson, K. (2009). The Blind Leading the Blind: A Third-Party Model for Bilateral Multi-issue Negotiations under Incomplete Information. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds) Advances in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 233. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03190-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03190-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03189-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03190-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics