Abstract
Usual processes for pursuing education excellence in a graduate program are candidate selection, coursework, research, and thesis defense. This paper is an experience report on a complementary approach: the growing of a peer review culture among graduate students. We instruct first-year masters and doctoral students on principles for preparing a thesis proposal. Students present their proposals in collective discussion sessions with feedback from professors. The students then submit their proposals through a web interface and are instructed on the role they will play next – of anonymous referees of their peers’ proposals. The referee reports and general statistics are made available to all participating students and advisers. Updated proposals are submitted to an annual workshop open to all participating students and advisers. About 60 students take part in this annual series of seminars with peer review and workshop, generating individual thesis proposals and 180 referee reports, 3 for each proposal. Students and their advisers receive detailed feedback on individual participation as author and referee. The main strength of this experience is the opportunity to assimilate the techniques of objective criticism and to reflect about the quality of own and others’ work. The paper outlines future research and development issues.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelov, C., Melnik, R.V.N., Buur, J.: The synergistic integration of mathematics, software engineering, and user-centered design: exploring new trends in education. Fut. Gen. Comp. Sys. 19(8), 1299–1307 (2003)
Bunge, M.: Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2003)
Bunge, M.: Systemism: the alternative to individualism and holism. J. Socio-Econ. 29(2), 147–157 (2000)
Bunge, M.: Mechanism and explanation. Phil. Soc. Sci. 27(4), 410–465 (1997)
Kern, V.M., Saraiva, L.M., Pacheco, R.C.S.: Peer review in education: promoting collaboration, written expression, critical thinking, and professional responsibility. Educ. Inf. Technol. 8(1), 37–46 (2003)
Hartman, J.: Writing to learn and communicate in a data structures course. In: 20th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 32–36 (1989)
Hafen, M.: Developing writing skills in computer science students. ACM SIGCSE Bul. 26(1), 268–270 (1994)
Cunningham, S.J.: Using a computer conferencing system to support writing and research skill development. ACM SIGCSE Bul. 26(4), 5–8 (1994)
Davies, R., Berrow, T.: An evaluation of the use of computer supported peer review for developing higher-level skills. Comput. Educ. 30(1/2), 111–115 (1998)
Gehringer, E.F.: Electronic peer review and peer grading in Computer-Science courses. ACM SIGCSE Bul. 33(1), 139–143 (2001)
Liu, E.Z., Lin, S.S.J., Chiu, C., Yuan, S.: Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Trans. Educ. 44(3), 246–251 (2001)
Moreira, D.A., Silva, E.Q.: A method to increase student interaction using student groups and peer review over the internet. Educ. Inf. Technol. 8(1), 47–54 (2003)
Sitthiworachart, J., Joy, M.: Web-based peer assessment in learning computer programming, In: 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2003) (2003)
Denning, T., Kelly, M., Lindquist, D., Malani, R., Griswold, W.G., Simon, B.: Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense? ACM SIGCSE Bul. 39(1), 266–270 (2007)
Smith, A.J.: The task of the referee. IEEE Computer 23(4), 46–51 (1990)
Schreiber, G., et al.: Knowledge engineering and management: the CommonKADS methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Riggs, T., Wilensky, R.: An algorithm for automated rating of reviewers. In: 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries, Roanoke, pp. 381—387 (2001)
Losada, M.: The complex dynamics of high performance teams. Math. Comput. Model. 30(9-10), 179–192 (1999)
Losada, M., Heaphy, E.: The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. Am. Behav. Scient. 47(6), 740–765 (2004)
Araújo, L.H.L.: Uma aplicação da dinâmica não-linear para a avaliação de desempenho de comunidades virtuais de aprendizagem [An application of nonlinear dynamics to performance evaluation of virtual learning communities]. Masters dissertation, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília-DF, Brasil (2004)
Kern, V.M., Pacheco, R.C.S., Saraiva, L.M., Pernigotti, J.M.: Peer review in Computer Science education: Requirements for continuous, large scale application. In: Mendes Neto, F.M., Brasileiro, F.V. (eds.) Advances in computer supported learning, pp. 46–65. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kern, V.M. et al. (2009). Growing a Peer Review Culture among Graduate Students. In: Tatnall, A., Jones, A. (eds) Education and Technology for a Better World. WCCE 2009. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 302. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03115-1_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03115-1_41
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03114-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03115-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)