NASA Education and Educational Technologies Exemplified by the Space Weather Action Center Program

  • Norma Teresinha Oliveira Reis
  • Claudio André
  • Troy D. Cline
  • Timothy E. Eastman
  • Margaret J. Maher
  • Louis A. Mayo
  • Elaine M. Lewis
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 302)


We explore here the Space Weather Action Center (SWAC) Program, as an example of NASA initiatives in education. Many human activities in space can be disrupted by space weather. The main objective of this program is to enable students to produce space weather forecasts by accessing current NASA data. Implementation of the SWAC Program requires: technological resources, online materials, and systematic work. Instructional guides, materials and methods are explained on the Space Weather Action Center Web site ( Ultimately, students’ forecasts can be presented through a variety of accessible media including inexpensive video editing software and/or already existing school-based broadcast studios. This cross-curricular program is targeted to middle and high school and can be applied in almost all educational contexts as the number of schools with computer and internet access increases worldwide. SWAC is a pioneer initiative that contributes to fostering student interest in STEM and promotes their intellectual autonomy. Through SWAC, they get to act like real scientists by accessing, analyzing, recording, and communicating space weather forecasts in a professional approach.


STEM education education technologies space science education 


  1. 1.
    Waack, R.S., Amoroso, S.: Desenvolvendo sustentabilidade. Parcerias Estratégicas 20, 451–458 (2005), (accessed February 15, 2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reis, N.T.O., Garcia, N.M.D., Souza, P.N., Baldessar, P.: Análise da dinâmica de rotação de um satélite artificial: uma oficina pedagógica em educação espacial. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física 30(1), 361–371 (2008), (accessed March 15, 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    OECD: PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. OECD Publishing, Paris (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    André, C.F.: A prática da pesquisa e mapeamento informacional bibliográfico apoiado por recursos tecnológicos: impactos na formação de professores (Doctoral thesis). Academic advisor: Stela Conceição Bertholo Pinonez. São Paulo, SP, Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo – USP (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosendhal, J., et al.: The NASA Office of Space Science Education and Public Outreach Program. Advances in Space Research 34, 2127–2135 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andrew, F.: Space science education in the United States: The good, the bad and the ugly. In: Steven, J.D., Roger, D.L. (eds.) Societal impact of spaceflight, NASA, Office of External Relations, History Division, Washington, DC, pp. 407–419 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    NASA: NASA education program, NASA, Education Division, Washington, DC (1993). Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    NASA: NASA education communication strategy, NASA, Washington, DC (2008), (accessed March 3, 2009)
  9. 9.
    NASA: NASA 101 – From Vision to reality, NASA, Washington, DC (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reis, N.T.O.: Pedagogical Analyses of Current Space Science Education Practices at NASA and the Brazilian Space Agency (Masters project). Academic advisor: Walter Peeters. Strasbourg (France), International Space University (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The National Academies Press: The Sun to the Earth and Beyond: A Decadal Research Strategy in Solar and Space Physics. Solar and Space Physics Survey Committee, National Research Council Washington, DC (2003), (accessed February 12, 2009)
  12. 12.
    Garcia, L., Eastman, T.: Space weather. About Plasmas, Available via The Coalition for Plasma Science (2009), (accessed February 20, 2009)
  13. 13.
    O’Regan, K.: Emotion and E-learning. Journal for Asynchronous Learning Networks – JALN 7(3), 78–92 (2003), (accessed February 15, 2009) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Novak, J.D., Canas, A.J.: The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC Cmap Tools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (2008), (accessed February 10, 2009)
  15. 15.
    Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Clark, R.E.: Why minimal guidance instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41(2), 75–86 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norma Teresinha Oliveira Reis
    • 1
  • Claudio André
    • 1
  • Troy D. Cline
    • 2
  • Timothy E. Eastman
    • 3
  • Margaret J. Maher
    • 4
  • Louis A. Mayo
    • 2
  • Elaine M. Lewis
    • 2
  1. 1.Brazilian Ministry of Education – MECBrazil
  2. 2.Honeywell Technology Solutions Inc.USA
  3. 3.Wyle Information Systems, LLCUSA
  4. 4.NASA Goddard Space Flight CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations