Modern 3D measuring systems using fringe projection provide robust measurements even under measuring conditions such as low fringe contrast and high noise. In order to give reliable statements about the measuring accuracy, a well-founded error analysis should be performed as e.g. suggested by Notni [1].
Chapter PDF
References
Notni, GH, and Notni, G (2003) Digital fringe projection in 3D shape measurement – an error analysis. Proc SPIE Vol.5144: 372–80
Kühmstedt, M, Bräuer-Burchardt, C, Munkelt, C, Heinze, M, Schmidt, I, Hintersehr, J, Notni, G (2007) Intraoral 3D-Scanner. Proc. SPIE vol. 6762, 67620E
Gray, F (1953) Pulse code communication. US-Patent Nr. 2.632.058
VDI/VDE 2617 Blatt 6.2 (2005) Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, p 27
Carmignato, S (2006) Tests and artefacts for determining the structural resolution of distance sensors for coordinate measurements. Proc 6thEuspen Int Conf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bräuer-Burchardt, C., Heinze, M., Munkelt, C., Kühmstedt, P., Notni, G. (2009). Influence of filter operators on 3D coordinate calculation in fringe projection systems. In: Osten, W., Kujawinska, M. (eds) Fringe 2009. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03051-2_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03051-2_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03050-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03051-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)