Skip to main content

Subgroup Discovery in Data Sets with Multi–dimensional Responses: A Method and a Case Study in Traumatology

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5651))

Abstract

Biomedical experimental data sets may often include many features both at input (description of cases, treatments, or experimental parameters) and output (outcome description). State-of-the-art data mining techniques can deal with such data, but would consider only one output feature at the time, disregarding any dependencies among them. In the paper, we propose the technique that can treat many output features simultaneously, aiming at finding subgroups of cases that are similar both in input and output space. The method is based on k-medoids clustering and analysis of contingency tables, and reports on case subgroups with significant dependency in input and output space. We have used this technique in explorative analysis of clinical data on femoral neck fractures. The subgroups discovered in our study were considered meaningful by the participating domain expert, and sparked a number of ideas for hypothesis to be further experimentally tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hand, D.J.: Handbook of data mining and knowledge discovery. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P.: The kdd process for extracting useful knowledge from volumes of data. Commun. ACM 39(11), 27–34 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lavrač, N., Flach, P., Kavšek, B., Todorovski, L.: Adapting classification rule induction to subgroup discovery. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 266–273 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lavrač, N., Kavšek, B., Flach, P., Todorovski, L.: Subgroup discovery with CN2-SD. Journal of Machine Learning Research 5, 153–188 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kavšek, B., Lavrač, N., Jovanoski, V.: APRIORI-SD: Adapting association rule learning to subgroup discovery. In: R. Berthold, M., Lenz, H.-J., Bradley, E., Kruse, R., Borgelt, C. (eds.) IDA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2810, pp. 230–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kavšek, B., Lavrač, N.: APRIORI-SD: Adapting association rule learning to subgroup discovery. Applied Artificial Intelligence 20(7), 543–583 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blockeel, H., De Raedt, L., Ramon, J.: Top-down induction of clustering trees. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 55–63. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ženko, B., Struyf, J.: Learning predictive clustering rules. In: Bonchi, F., Boulicaut, J.-F. (eds.) KDID 2005. LNCS, vol. 3933, pp. 234–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J.: Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. John Wiley, Chichester (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., Hastie, T.: Estimating the number of clusters in a dataset via the gap statistic (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rousseeuw, P.: Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20(1), 53–65 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Irigoien, I., Arenas, C.: INCA: new statistic for estimating the number of clusters and identifying atypical units. Statistics in Medicine 27(15), 2948–2973 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 57(1), 289–300 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kononenko, I.: Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of relief. In: Bergadano, F., De Raedt, L. (eds.) ECML 1994. LNCS, vol. 784, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Umek, L. et al. (2009). Subgroup Discovery in Data Sets with Multi–dimensional Responses: A Method and a Case Study in Traumatology. In: Combi, C., Shahar, Y., Abu-Hanna, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5651. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02976-9_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02976-9_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02975-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02976-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics