Skip to main content

A Tight Lower Bound for Determinization of Transition Labeled Büchi Automata

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5556))

Abstract

In this paper we establish a lower bound hist(n) for the problem of translating a Büchi word automaton of size n into a deterministic Rabin word automaton when both the Büchi and the Rabin condition label transitions rather than states. This lower bound exactly matches the known upper bound to this problem. The function hist(n) is in Ω((1.64n)n) and in o((1.65n)n).

Our result entails a lower bound of hist(n − 1) when the input Büchi automaton has its Büchi acceptance condition labeling states (as it is usual). Those lower bounds remain when the output deterministic Rabin automaton has its Rabin acceptance condition labeling states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Richard Büchi, J.: On a decision method in restricted second-order arithmetic, pp. 1–11 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klarlund, N.: Progress measures, immediate determinacy, and a subset construction for tree automata. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 69(2–3), 243–268 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kähler, D., Wilke, T.: Complementation, disambiguation, and determinization of Büchi automata unified. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5125, pp. 724–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Löding, C.: Optimal bounds for transformations of ω-automata. In: Pandu Rangan, C., Raman, V., Ramanujam, R. (eds.) FSTTCS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1738, pp. 97–109. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, W., Wang, J.: A tighter analysis of Piterman’s Büchi determinization (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McNaughton, R.: Testing and generating infinite sequences by a finite automaton. Information and Control 9, 521–530 (1966)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Michel, M.: Complementation is more difficult with automata on infinite words. In: CNET, Paris (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Muller, D.E., Schupp, P.E.: Simulating alternating tree automata by nondeterministic automata: New results and new proofs of the theorems of Rabin, McNaughton and Safra. Theor. Comput. Sci. 141(1&2), 69–107 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Piterman, N.: From nondeterministic Büchi and Streett automata to deterministic parity automata. Logical Methods in Computer Science 3(3) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rabin, M.O., Scott, D.: Finite automata and their decision problems. Technical report (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Safra, S.: On the complexity of ω-automata. In: FOCS, pp. 319–327 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schewe, S.: Büchi complementation made tight. In: STACS 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schewe, S.: Tighter bounds for the determinisation of Büchi automata. In: de Alfaro, L. (ed.) FoSSaCS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5504, pp. 167–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas, W.: Languages, automata and logic. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Languages, vol. 3. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yan, Q.Q.: Lower bounds for complementation of ω-automata via the full automata technique. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4052, pp. 589–600. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan, Q.Q.: Lower bounds for complementation of ω-automata via the full automata technique. Logical Methods in Computer Science 4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zielonka, W.: Infinite games on finitely coloured graphs with applications to automata on infinite trees. Theoretical Computer Science 200(1–2), 135–183 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Colcombet, T., Zdanowski, K. (2009). A Tight Lower Bound for Determinization of Transition Labeled Büchi Automata. In: Albers, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Matias, Y., Nikoletseas, S., Thomas, W. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5556. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02930-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02930-1_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02929-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02930-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics