Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Senaris A, Montes-Mico R. Prospective study of the Acri.LISA bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refractive Surgery 2007; 33:1930–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alio JL, Schimchak P, Montes-Mico R, Galal A. Retinal image quality after microincision intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:1557–1560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alio JL, Elkady B, Ortiz D, Bernabeu G. Clinical outcomes and intraocular optical quality of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with asymmetrical light distribution. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:942–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Assouline M, Weber K, Welt R, Barrett GD. Akreos Acrylic IOLs: Clinical Evidence Continues to Support Biocompatibility and Design Features. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated internal memo, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  5. Becker KA, Martin M, Rabsilber TM, et al Prospective, non-randomised, long term clinical evaluation of a foldable hydrophilic single piece intraocular lens: results of the Centerflex FDA study. Br J Ophthalmolo 2006; 90:971–974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang DF. Next-generation IOLs. Cataract Refract Surg Today 2005; 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dogru M, Honda R, Omoto M, et al Early visual results with the rollable ThinOptX intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:558–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M. The light-adjustable lens. In: Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS (eds) Refractive Lens Surgery. Springer, Berlin, 2005, pp 162–171

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hunkeler JD Update on the Thinoptx IOL. Cataract Refract Surg Today, 2004; 83–85

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson B, Sundelin S, Wikberg-Matsson A, et al Visual and optical performance of the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optics and Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lenses: Swedish multicenter study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33:1565–1572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaya V, Ozturker ZK, Ozturker C, et al ThinOptX vs AcrySof: Comparison of visual and refractive results, contrast sensitivity, and the incidence of posterior capsule opaci-fication. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007; 17:307–314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kellan RE Next-generation IOLs: Lenstecs's Kellan tetraf-lex IOL. Cataract Refract Surg Today 2005; 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim HK, Shin JP. Capsular block syndrome after cataract surgery: Clinical analysis and classificiation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:357–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin RG, Sanders DR. A comparison of higher order aberrations following implantation of four foldable intraocular lens designs. J Refract Surg 2005; 21:716–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mencucci R, Ponchietti C, Nocentini, et al Scanning electron microscopic analysis of acrylic intraocular lenses for microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32:318–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murta J. Bimanual microphacoemulsification and the new Akreos MI60 through 1.8 mm incision. In: The 25th Congress of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nishi Y, Rabsilber TM, Limberger IJ, et al Influence of 360-degree enhanced optic edge design of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33:227–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Norrby S. Injectable polymer. In: Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS (eds) Refractive Lens Surgery. Springer, Berlin, 2005, pp 174–186

    Google Scholar 

  19. O'hEineachain R. New microincision IOL provides multifo-cality and corrects astigmatism. EuroTimes 2008; 13(5):31

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ouchi M, Kinoshita S. Aberration-correcting effect of ThinOptX IOL. Eye 2007 (Online publication)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prakash P, Kasaby HE, Aggarwal RK, Humfrey S. Microincision bimanual phacoemulsification and Thinoptx implantation through a 1.70 mm incision. Eye 2007; 21:177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Radford SW, Carlsson AM, Barrett GD. Comparison of pseudophakic dysphotopsia with Akreos Adapt and SN60-AT intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33:88–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reiter J. Rotational stability of two posterior chamber intraocular lens designs: a comparative study. In: The 26th Congress of European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Annual Meeting; London, 12 September 2006

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rodriguez Prats JL, Alio JL, Galal A. MICS and new intraocular lens technologies. In: Alio JL, Rodriguez Prats JL, Galal A (eds) Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery. Highlights of Ophthalmology International, El Dorado, Panama, 2005, pp 67–91

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 2007; 114:1679–1684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Near visual acuity for everyday activities with accommodative and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2007; 23:747–751

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanders DR, Higginbotham RW, Opatowsky IE, Confino J. Hyperopic shift in refraction associated with implantation of the single-piece Collamer intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32:2110–2112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schild G, Amon M, Abela-Formanek C, et al Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of a single-piece, sharp-edged hydro-philic acrylic intraocular lens with collagen (Collamer): 1-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:1254–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwiegerling JT, Schwartz DM, Sandstedt CA, Jethmalani J. Light-adjustable intraocular lenses. Review of Refractive Surgery. Jobson, Newtown Square, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  30. Till JS. Collamer intraocular lens implantation with active uveitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29:2439–2443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vejarano LF, Vejarano A, Vejarano M, et al The safest and most effective technique in microincision cataract surgery. Highlights Ophthalmol 2004; 32:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wehner W. Microincision intraocular lens with plate haptic design. Evaluation of rotational stability and centering of a microincision intraocular lens with plate haptic design in 12–19 months of follow-up. Ophthalmologe 2007; 104:393–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Werner L, Mamalis N, Pandey SK, et al Posterior capsule opacification in rabbit eyes implanted with hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses with enhanced square edge. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:2403–2409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Werner L, Olson RJ, Mamalis N. New technology IOL optics. Ophthalmol Clin Am 2006; 19:469–483

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard S. Hoffman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoffman, R.S., Fine, I.H., Packer, M. (2010). Microincision Intraocular Lenses: Others. In: Alió, J.L., Fine, I.H. (eds) Minimizing Incisions and Maximizing Outcomes in Cataract Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02862-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02862-5_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02861-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02862-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics