Fine-Grained Analysis of Web Tasks through Data Visualization

  • Gennaro Costagliola
  • Vittorio Fuccella
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5648)


This paper presents an approach for monitoring several important aspects related to user behaviour during the execution of Web tasks. The approach includes the tracking of user interactions with the Web site and exploits visual data mining to highlight important information regarding Web application usage. In particular, our approach intends to be a natural heir of the approaches based on clickstream visualization, by integrating them with the visualization of page-level data and by improving them with the definition of ad-hoc zoom and filter operations. Furthermore, we present a theoretical framework to formally define our proposal. Lastly, in order to test the approach, a simple case-study for a particular practical usability evaluation has been carried out. To this aim, we built a prototypal system composed of a tracking tool, responsible for tracking user interactions and a visualization tool for task analysis.


User Behaviour Data Visualization Tracking Tool Label Direct Graph Visual Data Mining 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Kellar, M.: An examination of user behaviour during web information tasks. PhD thesis, Dalhousie University, Dalhousie Univ., Halifax, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sellen, A.J., Murphy, R., Shaw, K.L.: How knowledge workers use the web. In: CHI 2002: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 227–234. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murray, G.: Asynchronous javascript technology and xml (ajax) with the java platform (October 2006),
  4. 4.
    Thompson, S., Torabi, T.: A process improvement approach to improve web form design and usability. In: DEXA 2007: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 570–574. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hong, J.I., Heer, J., Waterson, S., Landay, J.A.: Webquilt: A proxy-based approach to remote web usability testing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 19, 263–285 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atterer, R., Wnuk, M., Schmidt, A.: Knowing the user’s every move: user activity tracking for website usability evaluation and implicit interaction. In: WWW 2006: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 203–212. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paganelli, L., Paternò, F.: Intelligent analysis of user interactions with web applications. In: IUI 2002: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pp. 111–118. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakamichi, N., Sakai, M., Shima, K., Hu, J., ichi Matsumoto, K.: Webtracer: A new web usability evaluation environment using gazing point information. Electron. Commer. Rec. Appl. 6(1), 63–73 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keim, D.A.: Information visualization and visual data mining. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 8(1), 1–8 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chi, E.H.: Improving web usability through visualization. IEEE Internet Computing 6(2), 64–71 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, J., Sun, L., Zaïane, O.R., Goebel, R.: Visualizing and discovering web navigational patterns. In: WebDB 2004: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on the Web and Databases, pp. 13–18. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brainard, J., Becker, B.: Case study: E-commerce clickstream visualization. In: IEEE Proceedings of Information Visualization 2001 (INFOVIS 2001), pp. 153–156. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cofino, T., Gomory, S., Lee, J., Podlaseck, M.: Method for graphically representing clickstream data of a shopping session on a network with a parallel coordinate system. U.S. Patent Office (2007), Patent number 7266510Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, J., Podlaseck, M.: Using a starfield visualization for analyzing product performance of online stores. In: EC 2000: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 168–175. ACM, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahlberg, C., Shneiderman, B.: Visual information seeking: Tight coupling of dynamic query filters with starfield displays. In: ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 313–317. ACM Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mueller, F., Lockerd, A.: Cheese: tracking mouse movement activity on websites, a tool for user modeling. In: CHI 2001: CHI 2001 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 279–280. ACM, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Costagliola, G., Fuccella, V., Giordano, M., Polese, G.: Monitoring online tests through data visualization. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2009 - to be printed)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Green, T.R.G., Petre, M.: Usability analysis of visual programming environments: A cognitive dimensions framework. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7, 131–174 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gennaro Costagliola
    • 1
  • Vittorio Fuccella
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and InformaticsUniversity of SalernoItaly

Personalised recommendations