Physiologically Driven Rehabilitation Using Virtual Reality
Creating a platform that allows the fusion of real-time physiological measurements and virtual reality (VR) simulation will greatly improve present human-computer interaction, adaptive displays, military training, and anxiety therapy. The Virtual Reality Medical Center (VRMC) has developed a physiologically-driven rehabilitation platform that correctly assesses user anxiety levels based on multiple real time physiological measures, determines the optimal level of physiological arousal for each individual user, and automates the virtual simulation to the proper intensity for each user. Additionally, VRMC collaborates with UCF to develop novel, state-of-the-art sensors to be integrated within the platform that are capable of measuring electrocardiogram, (EEG), skin conductance, gait, and pupillometry. In Phase I VRMC developed a capability to monitor, fuse, and evaluate physiological measures (heart rate, skin conductance, skin temperature, and respiration) in real time to assess user anxiety levels. The physiological data collected will be used to assess user anxiety levels in real time as neutral, low, or high with 90% accuracy and to determine the optimal level of physiological arousal for each individual user.
Keywordsphysiological measurement stroke traumatic brain injury cerebrovascular accident rehabilitation cognitive rehabilitation simulation mixed reality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Birbaumer, N., Kübler, A., Ghanayim, N., Hinterberger, T., Perelmouter, J., Kaiser, J., Iversen, I., Kotchoubey, B., Neumann, N., Flor, H.: The Thought Translation Device (TTD) for Completely Paralyzed Patients. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8(2), 190–193 (2000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Chen, D., Vertegaal, R.: Using mental load for managing interruptions in physiologically attentive user interfaces. In: Late breaking results paper, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004), Vienna, Austria, April 24-29, pp. 1513–1516 (2004)Google Scholar
- 6.Meehan, M., Insko, B., Whitton, M., Brooks Jr., F.P.: Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments. In: Association for Computing Machinery Transactions on Graphics, Special Issue: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2002, vol. 21(3), pp. 645–652 (2002)Google Scholar
- 9.Schwartz, M.S.: Biofeedback: A Practitioner’s Guide. Guilford Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
- 10.Seiler, K.S., Kjerland, G.O.: Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: Is there evidence for an ‘optimal’ distribution? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports (in press)Google Scholar
- 11.Slonim, N.B.: Environmental Physiology. The C.V. Mosby Company, Saint Louis (1974)Google Scholar
- 13.Wiederhold, B.K., Davis, R., Wiederhold, M.D.: The effects of immersiveness on physiology. In: Riva, G., Wiederhold, B.K., Molinari, E. (eds.) Virtual Environments in Clinical Psychology and Neuroscience, IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
- 16.Wilson, G.F., Lambert, J.D., Russell, C.A.: Performance enhancement with real-time physiologically controlled adaptive aiding. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, vol. 3, pp. 61–64 (1999)Google Scholar