Augmented Cognition Design Approaches for Treating Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries

  • Kay Stanney
  • Kelly Hale
  • David Jones
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5638)

Abstract

Augmented cognition could serve as an innovative rehabilitation approach for mild traumatic brain injuries, where issues with cognition, behavior, and affective responses are monitored in real-time and mitigation strategies are triggered to resolve performance or behavior issues. Such mitigations could guide individuals in addressing the current situation (e.g., performance decrement, undesired behavior, negative affective response), as well as provide rehabilitation support to improve performance and behavior in subsequent situations. This paper focuses on mitigation strategies that are suitable for an augmented cognition rehabilitation setting, with the goal of supporting recovery from suboptimal performance and providing rehabilitation tools in real-time, operational context.

Keywords

Augmented cognition mild traumatic brain injury mitigation strategies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adolphs, R.: Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: Psychological and neurological mechanisms. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 1, 21–62 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barker, R.A., Edwards, R.E., O’Neill, K.R., Tollar, J.R.: DARPA Improving Warfighter Information Intake Under Stress – Augmented Cognition Concept Validation Experiment Analysis Report for the Boeing Team (NBCH030031). DARPA, Arlington (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beer, J.S., John, O.P., Scabini, D., Knight, R.T.: Orbitofrontal cortex and social behavior: integrating self-monitoring and emotion-cognition interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(6), 871–879 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bose, T., van Doesburg, W., van Maanen, P.-P., Treur, J.: Augmented metacognition addressing dynamic allocation of tasks requiring visual attention. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Reeves, L.M. (eds.) Foundations of Augmented Cognition, Proceedings of 3rd Augmented Cognition International, Beijing China, July 22-27, pp. 166–175 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cappa, S.F., Benke, T., Clarke, S., Rossi, B., Stemmer, B., van Heugten, C.M.: EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS Task Force. European Journal of Neurology 12, 665–680 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cicerone, K.D.: Remediation of ’working attention’ in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 16(3), 185–195 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cicerone, K.D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., Langenbahn, D.M., Malec, J.F., Bergquist, T.F., Felicetti, T., Giacino, J.T., Harley, J.P., Harrington, D.E., Herzog, J., Kneipp, S., Laatsch, L., Morse, P.A.: Evidence based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81(12), 1596–1615 (2000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crowe, S.F.: The behavioural and emotional complications of traumatic brain injury. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fabiano, R.J., Daugherty, J.: Rehabilitation considerations following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation 64(4), 9–14 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fuchs, S., Hale, K.S., Stanney, K.M., Juhnke, J., Schmorrow, D.: Enhancing mitigation in augmented cognition. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 1(3), 309–326 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grafman, J.: Executive functions. In: Parasuraman, R., Rizzo, M. (eds.) Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work, pp. 159–177. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hudlicka, E.: Modeling interaction between metacognition and emotion in a cognitive architecture. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Metacognition in Computation, AAAI Technical Report SS-05-04, pp. 55–61. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kellera, M., Hiltbrunnerb, B., Dilla, C., Kesselring, J.: Reversible neuropsychological deficits after mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 68, 761–764 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kennedy, M.R.T., Coelho, C.: Self-regulation after traumatic brain injury: a framework for intervention of memory and problem solving. In: Turkstra, L.S. (ed.) Seminars in Speech and Language, vol. 26(4), pp. 242–255 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kornør, H., Winje, D., Ekeberg, O., Weisæth, L., Kirkehei, I., Johansen, K., Steiro, A.: Early trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy to prevent chronic post-traumatic stress disorder and related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 8, 81 (2008)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liebman, S.: Stress situations. Lippincott, Philadelphia (1955)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marin, R.S., Wilkosz, P.A.: Disorders of diminished motivation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 20, 377–388 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mathiak, K., Hertrich, I., Świrszcz, K., Zvyagintzsev, M., Lutzenberger, W., Ackermann, H.: Preattentive crossmodal information processing under distraction and fatigue. In: Schmorrow, D.D. (ed.) Foundations of Augmented Cognition, pp. 1055–1064. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McAllister, T.W.: Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury: evaluation and management. World Psychiatry 7(1), 3–10 (2008)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McAllister, T.W., Saykin, A.J., Flashman, L.A., Sparling, M.B., Johnson, S.C., Guerin, S.J., Mamourian, A.C., Weaver, J.B., Yanofsky, N.: Brain activation during working memory 1 month after mild traumatic brain injury: A functional MRI study. Neurology 53(6), 1300–1308 (1999)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McAllister, T.W., Sparling, M.B., Flashman, L.A., Guerin, S.J., Mamourian, A.C., Saykin, A.J.: Differential working memory load effects after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage 14(5), 1004–1012 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Traumatic brain injury: hope through research. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda. NIH Pub No.: 02-158 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niemann, H., Ruff, R.M., Kramer, J.H.: An attempt towards differentiating attentional deficits in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology Review 6(1), 11–46 (1996)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Qu, L., Wang, N., Johnson, W.L.: Using learner focus of attention to detect learner motivation factors. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3538, pp. 70–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rao, V., Spiro, J.R., Schretlen, J.D., Cascella, N.G.: Apathy syndrome after traumatic brain injury compared with deficits in schizophrenia. Psychosomatics 48, 217–222 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rebann, M., Hannon, R.: Treatment of unawareness of memory deficits in adults with brain injury: three case studies. Rehabilitation Psychology 40, 279–287 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rohling, M.L., Faust, M.E., Beverly, B., Demakis, G.: Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: A meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.’s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsychology 23(1), 20–39 (2009)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saunders, T., Driskell, J., Johnston, J., Salas, E.: The Effects of Stress Inoculation Training on Anxiety and Performance. J. of Occupational Health Psych. 1(2), 170–186 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schmorrow, D.D., Stanney, K.M.: Augmented Cognition: A Practitioner’s Guide. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sohlberg, M.M., Avery, J., Kennedy, M., Ylvisaker, M., et al.: Practice guidelines for direct attention training. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 11, 19–39 (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Taylor, R., Bonner, M., Dickson, B., Howells, H., Miller, C., Milton, N., Pleydell-Pearce, K., Shadbolt, N., Tennison, J., Whitecross, S.: Cognitive cockpit engineering: Coupling functional state assessment, task knowledge management, and decision support for context-sensitive aiding. In: McNeese&, M., Viculich, M. (eds.) Cognitive systems engineering in military aviation environments: Avoiding cogminutia fragmentosa!, pp. 253–314. Human Systems Information Analysis Center Press, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thurman, D., Alverson, C., Dunn, K., Guerrero, J., Sniezek, J.: Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 14(6), 602–615 (1999)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tremoulet, P., Barton, P., Craven, P., Corrado, C., Mayer, G., Stibler, K., et al.: DARPA Improving Warfighter Information Intake Under Stress – Augmented Cognition Phase 3 Concept Validation Experiment (CVE) Analysis Report for the Lockheed-Martin ATL Team (Prepared under contract No. NBCH030032). DARPA/IPTO, Arlington (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Trudeau, D.L., Anderson, J., Hansen, L.M., Shagalov, D.N., Schmoller, J., Nugent, S., Barton, S.: Findings of mild traumatic brain injury in combat veterans with PTSD and a history of blast concussion. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 10, 308–313 (1998)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vining Radomski, M.: Traumatic brain injury. In: Vining Radomski, M., Trombly Latham, C.A. (eds.) Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction, 6th edn., pp. 1042–1078. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore (2007)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilson, G.F., Russell, C.A.: Psychophysiologically versus task determined adaptive aiding accomplishment. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Stanney, K.M., Reeves, L.M. (eds.) Foundations of augmented cognition, 2nd edn., pp. 201–207. Strategic Analysis, Inc., Arlington (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kay Stanney
    • 1
  • Kelly Hale
    • 1
  • David Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Design Interactive, Inc.USA

Personalised recommendations