Augmented Cognition as Rehabilitation: Facilitating Neuroplasticity?

  • Michael Feuerstein
  • Gina Luff
  • Mark Peugeot
  • Miki Moskowitz
  • Briana Todd
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5638)


Different types of brain injury are associated with deficits in working memory, executive functioning, and information processing speed, which can impact performance at work. Augmented Cognition (AugCog), a technology developed to improve human performance in complex tasks, may have potential for optimizing cognitive functioning in the context of work for those with mild to moderate cognitive deficits. AugCog is a way to accommodate or augment function thus improving the performance of the operator. This approach may facilitate neuroplasticity that can occur following injury to the brain. The authors will provide the rationale, operational structure, and potential application to occupational rehabilitation.


Augmented cognition occupational rehabilitation cognitive limitations mild brain injury 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Tanielian, T., Jaycox, L.H. (eds.): Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, & Services to Assist Recovery. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kreukels, B.P.C., Schagen, S.B., Ridderinkhof, K.R., Boogerd, W., Hamburger, H.L., van Dam, F.S.A.M.: Electrophysiological Correlates of Information Processing in Breast-Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 94, 53–61 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kreukels, B.P.C., Hamburger, H.L., de Ruiter, M.B., van Dam, F.S.A.M., Ridderinkhof, K.R., Boogerd, W., Schagen, S.B.: ERP Amplitude and Latency in Breast Cancer Survivors Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Clinical Neurophysiology 119, 533–541 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Remer, S., Murphy, M.E.: The Challenges of Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Adults with Malignant Gliomas. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing 8, 368–376 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schagen, S.B., Hamburger, H.L., Muller, M.J., Boogerd, W., van Dam, F.S.A.M.: Neurophysiological Evaluation of Late Effects of Adjuvant High-Dose Chemotherapy on Cognitive Function. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 51, 159–165 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Serino, A., Ciaramelli, E., Di Santantonio, A., Malagu, S., Servadei, F., Ladavas, E.: Central Executive System Impairment in Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Injury 20, 23–32 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grafman, J.: Executive functions. In: Parasuraman, R., Rizzo, M. (eds.) Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work, pp. 159–177. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stulemeijer, M., Van Der Werf, S.P., Jacobs, B., Biert, J., Van Vugt, A.B., Brauer, J.M.P., Vos, P.E.: Impact of Additional Extracranial Injuries on Outcome after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 23(10), 1561–1569 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Binder, L.M., Rohling, M.K., Larrabee, G.J.: A review of mild head trauma, part I: Meta-Analytic Review of Neuropsychological Studies. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 19(3), 421–423 (1997)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parasuraman, R., Rizzo, M.: Introduction to Neuroergonomics. In: Parasuraman, R., Rizzo, M. (eds.) Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work, pp. 3–12. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stanney, K.M., Schmorrow, D.D., Johnston, M., Fuchs, S., Jones, D., Hale, K., Ahmad, A., Young, P.: Augmented Cognition. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 5 (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schilder, C.M., Eggens, P.C., Seynaeve, C., Linn, S.C., Boogerd, W., Gundy, C.M., Beex, L.V., van Dam, F.S., Schagen, S.B.: Neuropsychological Functioning in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Tamoxifen or Exemestane After AC-Chemotherapy: Cross-Sectional Findings from the Neuropsychological TEAM-Side Study. Acta Oncologia 48, 76–85 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Castellon, S.A., Ganz, P.A., Bower, J.E., Petersen, L., Abraham, L., Greendale, G.A.: Neurocognitive Performance in Breast Cancer Survivors Exposed to Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Tamoxifen. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 26(7), 955–969 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jenkins, V., Shilling, V., Fallowfield, L., Howell, A., Hutton, S.: Does Hormone Therapy for the Treatment of Breast Cancer Have a Detrimental Effect on Memory and Cognition? A Pilot Study. Psycho-Oncology 13, 61–66 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McHugh, T., Laforce, R., Gallagher, P., Quinn, S., Diggle, P., Buchanan, L.: Natural History of the Long-Term Cognitive, Affective, and Physical Sequlea of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain and Cognition 60, 209–211 (2006)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, H., Wintermark, M., Gean, A.D., Ghajar, J., Manley, G.T., Mukherjee, P.: Focal Lesions in Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurocognitive Outcome: CT Versus 3T MRI. Journal of Neurotrauma 25, 1049–1056 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reppermund, S., Ising, M., Lucae, S., Zihl, J.: Cognitive Impairment in Unipolar Depression is Persistent and Non-Specific: Further Evidence for the Final Common Pathway Disorder Hypothesis. Psychological Medicine (2008) (epub ahead of print )Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanna-Pladdy, B., Berry, Z.M., Bennett, T., Phillips, H.L., Gouvier, W.D.: Stress as a Diagnostic Challenge for Postconcussive Symptoms: Sequelae of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury or Physiological Stress Response. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 15(3), 289–304 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoge, C.W., Terhakopian, A., Castro, C.A., Messer, S.C., Engel, C.C.: Association of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder with Somatic Symptoms, Health Care Visits, and Absenteeism among Iraq War Veterans. American Journal of Psychiatry 164(1), 150–153 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lupien, S.J., Maheu, F., Tu, M., Fiocco, A., Schramek, T.E.: The Effects of Stress and Stress Hormones on Human Cognition: Implications for the Field of Brain and Cognition. Brain and Cognition 65, 209–237 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lew, H.L., Poole, J.H., Chiang, J.Y.P., Lee, E.H., Date, E.S., Warden, D.: Event-Related Potential in Facial Affect Recognition: Potential Clinical Utility in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 42(1), 29–34 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kreukels, B.P.C., Schagen, S.B., Ridderinkhof, K.R., Boogerd, W., Hamburger, H.L., Muller, M.J., van Dam, F.S.A.M.: Effects of High-Dose and Conventional-Dose Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Long-Term Cognitive Sequelae in Patients with Breast Cancer: An Electrophysiologic Study. Clinical Breast Cancer 7, 67–78 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mathan, S., Whitlow, S., Feyereisen, T.: WorkSense: Exploring the Feasibility of Human Factors Assessment Using. Electrophysiological Sensors. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the Augmented Cognition Society, HFES, Santa Monica (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fuchs, S., Hale, K.S., Stanney, K.M., Juhnke, J., Schmorrow, D.: Enhancing Mitigation in Augmented Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 1(3), 309–326 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duffau, H.: Brain Plasticity: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Therapeutic Applications. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 13, 885–897 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taub, E.: Harnessing Brain Plasticity through Behavioral Techniques to Produce New Treatments in Neurorehabilitation. American Psychologist 59, 692–704 (2004)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Feuerstein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gina Luff
    • 3
  • Mark Peugeot
    • 1
  • Miki Moskowitz
    • 1
  • Briana Todd
    • 1
  1. 1.Uniformed Services University of the Health SciencesBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Georgetown University Medical CenterWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.American UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations