Perceptually-Informed Virtual Environment (PerceiVE) Design Tool

  • Anna Skinner
  • Jack Vice
  • Corinna Lathan
  • Cali Fidopiastis
  • Chris Berka
  • Marc Sebrechts
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5638)


Virtual environments (VE’s) are becoming more and more prevalent as training tools for both military and civilian applications. The common assumption is that the more realistic the VE, the better the transfer of training to real world tasks. However, some aspects of task content and fidelity may result in stronger transfer of training than even the most high fidelity simulations. This research effort seeks to demonstrate the technical feasibility of a Perceptually-informed Virtual Environment (PerceiVE) Design Tool, capable of dynamically detecting changes in operator behavior and physiology throughout a VE experience and comparing those changes to operator behavior and physiology in real-world tasks. This approach could potentially determine which aspects of VE fidelity will have the highest impact on transfer of training. A preliminary study was conducted in which psychophysiological and performance data were compared for a visual search tasks with low and high fidelity conditions. While no significant performance effects were found across conditions, event-related potential (ERP) data revealed significant differences between the low and high fidelity stimulus conditions. These results suggest that psychophysiological measures may provide a more sensitive and objective measure for determining VE fidelity requirements.


Psychophysiological Measures Virtual Environments Fidelity Transfer of Training Simulation Design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lathan, C.E., Tracey, M.R., Sebrechts, M.M., Clawson, D.M., Higgins, G.: Using virtual environments as training simulators: Measuring transfer. In: Stanney, K. (ed.) Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, pp. 403–414. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sebrechts, M.M., Lathan, C.E., Clawson, D.M., Miller, M.S., Trepagnier, C.: Transfer of training in virtual environments: issues for human performance. In: Hettinger, L.J., Haas, M.W. (eds.) Virtual and Adaptive Environments; Applications, Implications, and Human Performance Issues, pp. 67–90. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Waller, D., Hunt, E., Knapp, D.: The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual environments 7(2), 129–143 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., John, E.R.: Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150, 1187–1188 (1965)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donchin, E., Coles, M.G.H.: Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 357–374 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verleger, R.: Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 343–427 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thorpe, S., Fize, D., Marlot, C.: Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381, 520–522 (1996)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fabre-Thorpe, M., Delorme, A., Marlot, C., Thorpe, S.: A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13, 171–180 (2001)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson, J.S., Olshausen, B.A.: Timecourse of neural signatures of object recognition. Journal of Vision, 3(7), 499-512 (2003),
  10. 10.
    VanRullen, R., Thorpe, S.J.: The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13, 454–461 (2001b)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berka, C., et al.: Real-time Analysis of EEG Indices of Alertness, Cognition and Memory with Wireless EEG Headset. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 17(2), 151–170 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Skinner
    • 1
  • Jack Vice
    • 1
  • Corinna Lathan
    • 1
  • Cali Fidopiastis
    • 2
  • Chris Berka
    • 3
  • Marc Sebrechts
    • 4
  1. 1.AnthroTronix, Inc.Silver SpringUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Simulation and TrainingUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  3. 3.Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc.CarlsbadUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyCatholic University of AmericaWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations