Advertisement

Realizing Adaptive Instruction (Ad-In): The Convergence of Learning, Instruction, and Assessment

  • Edward Dieterle
  • John Murray
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5638)

Abstract

In this paper, we define adaptive instruction, or Ad-In, as applied to sophisticated skills development systems that target learning and assessment in a highly individualized and interactive manner. We argue that the successful design and use of such systems rely heavily upon the interrelationships among learning styles, instructional theories, and assessment methods, in the context of personalized learning. We outline and structure the links among these topics by drawing upon recent empirical studies of virtual environments and augmented realities. The paper also presents a candidate architecture for applying Ad-In concepts in an intelligent interactive environment for skills development.

Keywords

Adaptive instruction augmented reality immersion intelligent tutoring assistant multi-user virtual environment neomillennial learning styles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    National Research Council: How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keefe, J.W.: Learning style: Theory and practice. National Association of Secondary School Principals, Reston (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L.: A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In: Sternberg, R.J., Zhang, L.-f. (eds.) Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles, pp. 1–21. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, L.-f., Sternberg, R.J.: The nature of intellectual styles. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sternberg, R.J.: Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sternberg, R.J., Zhang, L.-f. (eds.): Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dede, C., Dieterle, E., Clarke, J., Ketelhut, D.J., Nelson, B.: Media-based learning styles: Implications for distance education. In: Moore, M. (ed.) Handbook of distance education, pp. 339–352. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ardichvili, A., Page, V., Wentling, T.: Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 7, 64–77 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dubé, L., Bourhis, A., Jacob, R.: The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice. Management 18, 145–166 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Entertainment Software Association: Essential facts about the computer and video game industry: 2008 sales, demographic, and usage data. Entertainment Software Association, Washington (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dieterle, E., Clarke, J.: Multi-user virtual environments for teaching and learning. In: Pagani, M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of multimedia technology and networking. Idea Group, Inc., Hershey (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American 265, 94–104 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abowd, G.D., Mynatt, E.D.: Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7, 29–58 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitchell, W.J.: Me++: The cyborg self and the networked city. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rheingold, H.: Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greenfield, A.: Everyware: The dawning age of ubiquitous computing. New Riders, Berkeley (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van ‘t Hooft, M., Swan, K. (eds.): Ubiquitous computing in education: Invisible technology, visible Impact. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dieterle, E.: Wireless handheld devices as tools for thinking and learning in university settings. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Klopfer, E.: Augmented learning: Research and design of mobile educational games. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dede, C.: The evolution of constructivist learning environments: Immersion in distributed, virtual worlds. Educational Technology 35, 46–52 (1995)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winn, W.: Learning in artificial environments: Embodiment, embeddedness and dynamic adaptation. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning 1, 87–114 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dieterle, E.: Games for science education. In: Hirumi, A. (ed.) Playing [video] games in schools: Engaging learners through interactive entertainment, International Society for Technology in Education, OR (in press)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ketelhut, D.J., Dede, C., Clarke, J., Nelson, B., Bowman, C.: Studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment. In: Baker, E., Dickieson, J., Wulfeck, W., O’Neil, H. (eds.) Assessment of problem solving using simulations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schrier, K.: Reliving history with “reliving the revolution”: Designing augmented reality games to teach the critical thinking of history. In: Gibson, D., Aldrich, C., Prensky, M. (eds.) Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks, pp. 250–270. Information Science Publishing, Hershey (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dieterle, E., Dede, C., Schrier, K.L.: “Neomillennial” learning styles propagated by wireless handheld devices. In: Lytras, M., Naeve, A. (eds.) Ubiquitous and pervasive knowledge and learning management: Semantics, social networking and new media to their full potential, pp. 35–66. Idea Group, Inc., Hershey (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dede, C.: Planning for “neomillennial” learning styles: Implications for investments in technology and faculty. In: Oblinger, J., Oblinger, D. (eds.) Educating the net generation, pp. 226–247. Educause Publishers, Boulder (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dieterle, E.: Neomillennial learning styles and River City. Children in Technological Environments: Interaction, Development, and Design, a Special Issue of Children, Youth and Environments 19 (in press)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dieterle, E.: The convergence of neomillennial learning styles and a multi-user virtual environment. Teaching and Learning. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Darling-Hammond, L.: Futures of teaching in American education. Journal of Educational Change 1, 353–373 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tyack, D.B.: The one best system: A history of American urban education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1974)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kegan, R.: In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gardner, H.: Multiple intelligences: New horizons. Basic Books, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Battro, A.M., Fischer, K.W., Léna, P.J. (eds.): The educated brain: Essays in neuroeducation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Duckworth, E.R.: ”Tell me more”: Listening to learners explain. Teachers College Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    National Academy of Engineering: Grand challenges for engineering, vol. 2009 (2008) Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sheingold, K., Frederiksen, J.: Using technology to support innovative assessment. In: Means, B. (ed.) Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise, pp. 111–132. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1994)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Salomon, G., Perkins, D.: Do technologies make us smarter? Intellectual amplification with, of and through technology. In: Sternberg, R.J., Preiss, D. (eds.) Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities, pp. 71–86. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Anderson, J.R., Greeno, J.G., Reder, L.M., Simon, H.A.: Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher 29, 11–13 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Dieterle
    • 1
  • John Murray
    • 1
  1. 1.SRI InternationalMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations