Advertisement

Tunnel Operator Training with a Conversational Agent-Assistant

  • Eric Buiël
  • Jan Lubbers
  • Willem van Doesburg
  • Tijmen Muller
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5638)

Abstract

A tunnel operator monitors and regulates the flow of traffic inside a tunnel. Tunnel operators need to train in a simulator regularly in order to maintain proficiency in handling incident situations. During quiet working hours, the operator has enough time for training. But generally at that time no instructor or colleague operators are present to provide instruction, advises, and feedback. As a solution, we have designed an automated training system. The system employs a conversational agent which supports the operator’s situation assessment tasks. The agent exhibits peer behavior which is unobtrusively directed by didactic strategies. In this paper we present the design, development and application of the agent.

Keywords

Agent-Based Modeling and Training Cognitive Modeling Constructive Learning Intelligent Virtual Agent 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rickel, J., Marcella, S., Gratch, J., Hill, R., Traum, D.R., Swartout, W.R.: Toward a New Generation of Virtual Humans for Interactive Experiences. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17(4), 32–38 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Traum, D.R., Rickel, J.: Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual worlds. In: Proceedings of the first International Joint conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent systems, pp. 766–773 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W., Lester, J.C.: Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 47–78 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkinson, R.K.: Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 416–427 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E.: e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Spires, H., Lester, J.: The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do trainees learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction 19, 177–214 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mueller, C.M., Dweck, C.S.: Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of personality and social psychology 75, 33–52 (1998)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kidd, C.D., Breazeal, C.: Sociable robot systems for real-world problems. In: IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 353–358 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bickmore, T.W., Picard, R.W.: Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 12, 293–327 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dryer, D.C.: Getting personal with computers: How to design personalities for agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13, 273–295 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van der Hulst, A., Muller, T.J., Besselink, S., Coetsier, D., Roos, C.L.: Bloody Serious Gaming – Experiences with Job Oriented Training. In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, FL (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stehouwer, M., Stricker, J., van Gemeren, W.: Training Design for Professional Development. In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, FL, p. 12 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37(1), 32–64 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van den Bosch, K., Helsdingen, A.S.: Critical Thinking in Tactical Decision Games Training. In: Cook, M., Noyes, J., Masakowski, Y. (eds.) Decision Making in Complex Environments, pp. 213–222. Ashgate, Aldershot (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Buiël
    • 1
  • Jan Lubbers
    • 1
  • Willem van Doesburg
    • 1
  • Tijmen Muller
    • 1
  1. 1.TNO Defense, Security and SafetySoesterbergThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations