Applying Real Time Physiological Measures of Cognitive Load to Improve Training
This paper discusses how the fields of augmented cognition and neuroergonomics can be expanded into training. Several classification algorithms based upon EEG data and occular data are discussed in terms of their ability to classify operator state in real time. These indices have been shown to enhance operator performance within adaptive automation paradigms. Learning is different from performing a task that one is familiar with. According to cognitive load theory (CLT), learning is essentially the act of organizing information from working memory into long term memory. However, our working memory system has a bottleneck in this process, such that when training exceeds working memory capacity, learning is hindered. This paper discusses how CLT can be combined with multiple resource theory to create a model of adaptive training. This new paradigm hypothesizes that a system that can monitor working memory capacity in real time and adjust training difficulty can improve learning.
KeywordsCognitive Load Instructional Design Work Memory Capacity Cognitive Load Theory Mental Workload
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Wickens, C.D.: Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman, R., Daives, D.R. (eds.) Varieties of attention, pp. 63–102. Academic Press, New York (1984)Google Scholar
- 4.Baddley, A.D.: Working Memory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
- 5.Parasuraman, R., Caggiano, D.: Neural and genetic assays of mental workload. In: McBride, D., Schmorrow, D.D. (eds.) Quantifying Human Information Processing Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.DuRousseau, D.R., Mannucci, M.A.: eXecutive Load Index (XLI): Spaital-frequency EEG tracks moment-to moment changes in high-order attentional resourcesFoundations of Augmented Cognition, pp. 245–251. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
- 16.Berka, C., Levendowski, D., Lumicao, M.N., Yau, A., Davis, G., Zivkovic, V.T., Olmstead, R.E., Tremoulet, P., Craven, P.L.: EEG Correlates of Task Engagement and Mental Workload in Vigilance, Learning, and Memory Tasks. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 78, B231–B244 (2007)Google Scholar
- 19.Di Nocera, F., Terenzi, M., Camilli, M.: Another look at scanpath: Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of mental workload. In: de Waard, D., Brookhuis, K.A., Toffetti, A. (eds.) Developments in human factors in transportation, design, and evaluation, pp. 295–303. Shaker, Maastricht (2006)Google Scholar
- 20.Marshall, S.P., Pleydell-Pearce, C.W., Dickson, B.T.: Integrating psychophysiological measures of cognitive workload and eye movements to detect strategy shifts. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 6 (2003)Google Scholar
- 21.Marshall, S.P.: The Index of Cognitive Activity: measuring cognitive workload. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, pp. 7-5–7-9 (2002)Google Scholar
- 22.van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B., Pass, F.: Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior (25), 325–331 (2009)Google Scholar
- 23.Marshall, S.P.: Identifying Cognitive State from Eye Metrics. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 78(5, Section II), B165–B175 (2007)Google Scholar
- 27.Kahneman, D.: Attention and effort. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)Google Scholar
- 30.Shiffrin, R.M., Schneider, W.: Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review 84(2), 127–190 (1977)Google Scholar