Advertisement

Proposing Strategies to Prevent the Human Error in Automated Industrial Environments

  • José A. do N. Neto
  • Maria F. Q. Vieira
  • Charles Santoni
  • Daniel Scherer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5638)

Abstract

This paper presents a process to conceive strategies to prevent the human error when operating industrial systems. The process adopts a broader view to error prevention, going beyond the error analysis to consider the user profile, the task and context description. The error classification is done according to a task execution cognitive model. The conceived strategies focus on the human interface component of those systems since it is this work’s premise that the human interface design has a strong impact on the human error rate.

Keywords

Human-Machine Interfaces Human error Cognitive model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Laprie, A.J.C., Randell, B., Landwehr, C.: Basic Concepts and Taxonomy of Dependable and Secure Computing. IEEE Trans. on Dependable and Secure Computing 1(1), 11–33 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cellier, J.M.: L’erreur humaine dans le travail. In: Leplat, Jaques, De Terssac, Gilbert. Les facteurs humains de la fiabilité dans les systemes complexes, Avec la colaboration de: J.M. Cellier, M. Neboit, A. Oudiz. Octares, Marseille (1990), ISBN 2- 906-769-03-7Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dekker, S.: The Field Guide To Human Error Investigations. Ashgate Publishing Co. (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guerrero, C.V.S., Vieira, M.F.Q., Mercantini, J.M., Santoni, C.: A process for Human Centered Modelling of Incident Scenarios. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2008, 1st edn. LNCS, vol. 5298, pp. 439–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hollnagel, E.: Barriers and Accidents Prevention. In: ASHGATE Pub Ltd, ed. (2004), ISBN: 0754643018Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (1998) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laprie, J.-C.: Guide de la sûreté de fonctionnement. Cépaduès - Editions., Toulouse, p. 324 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norman, D.A.: Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review (1981)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rasmussen, J.: The Definition of Human Error and Taxonomy for Techincal System Design. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Santoni, C., Turnell, M.F.Q.V., Mercantini, J.M., Scaico, A., Nascimento, J.A.N.: A real-time interface simulator for operator’s training: a proposed architecture. In: Summer Simulation Multiconference, 2007, San Diego, vol. 1, pp. 460–467. The Society for Modeling and Simulation International (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swain, A.D.: Human factor associated with prescribed action links. USA Sandia Laboratories, Sand (1976)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Elslande, P., Alberton: L’Accident de la Route: Chercher l’ Erreur. Securité et Cognition, Hermes Editions (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vieira, M.F.Q.: Accounting for Human Errors in a Method for the Conception of User Interfaces. In: International Mediterranean Modeling MultiConference - I3M 2004, Genoa, Italy, Proceedings of I3M 2004, Bergeggi Italia, vol. 1, pp. 122–130 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vieira, M.F.Q., De Queiroz, J.E.R., de Oliveira, R.C.L.: WebQuest: a configurable web tool to prospect the user profile and user subjective satisfaction. In: 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2005. MIRA Digital Publishing, Las Vegas (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • José A. do N. Neto
    • 1
  • Maria F. Q. Vieira
    • 1
  • Charles Santoni
    • 2
  • Daniel Scherer
    • 1
  1. 1.LIHM –DEE – CEEI UFCGCampina GrandeBrazil
  2. 2.LSIS, Université Paul Cézanne (Aix-Marseille III)France

Personalised recommendations