Adaptive Interfaces in Driving

  • Rino F. T. Brouwer
  • Marieka Hoedemaeker
  • Mark A. Neerincx
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5638)

Abstract

The automotive domain is an excellent domain for investigating augmented cognition methods, and one of the domains that can provide the applications. We developed, applied and tested indirect (or derived) measures to estimate driver state risks, validated by direct state-sensing methods, with major European vehicle manufacturers, suppliers and research institutes in the project AIDE (Adaptive Integrated Driver-vehicle InterfacE). The project developed an interface with the driver that integrates different advanced driver assistant systems and in-vehicle information systems and adapted the interface to different driver or traffic conditions. This paper presents an overview of the AIDE project and will then focus on the adaptation aspect of AIDE. Information presented to the driver could be adapted on basis of environmental conditions (weather and traffic), and on basis of assessed workload, distraction, and physical condition of the driver. The adaptation of how information is presented to the driver or the timing of when information is presented to the driver is of importance. Adapting information, however, also results in systems that are less transparent to the driver.

Keywords

In-car services workload adaptive user interface central management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schmorrow, D.D., Nicholson, D.M., Drexler, J.M., Reeves, L.M. (eds.): Proc. 4th Intern. Augmented Cognition. Strategic Analysis, Inc., Arlington (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Voskamp, J.: Measuring cognitive workload in non-military scenarios: criteria for sensor technologies. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the Augmented Cognition, San Diego, CA, USA, July 19-24 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Truong, K.P., van Leeuwen, D.A., Neerincx, M.A.: Unobtrusive Multimodal Emotion Detection in Adaptive Interfaces: Speech and Facial Expressions. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Reeves, L.M. (eds.) HCII 2007 and FAC 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4565, pp. 354–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grootjen, M., Neerincx, M.A., Stolk, K.D., Weert, J.C.M.: Design and user evaluation of an interface prototype that adapts to the operator’s cognitive task load. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Nicholson, D.M., Drexler, J.M., Reeves, L.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the Augmented Cognition, pp. 97–106. Strategic Analysis, Inc., Arlington (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKnight, J., McKnight, S.: The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accidents Analysis and Prevention 25, 259–265 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoedemaeker, M., Neerincx, M.A.: Attuning In-Car User Interfaces to the Momentary Cognitive Load. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Reeves, L.M. (eds.) HCII 2007 and FAC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4565, pp. 286–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verwey, W.B.: Evaluating safety effects of traffic congestion information systems. In: Hancock, P.A., Desmond, P. (eds.) Stress, workload and fatigue, pp. 409–425. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klauer, S.G.: The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nilsson, G.: Traffic safety dimensions and the power model to describe the effect of speed on safety. Doctoral Thesis Lund Institute of Technology. Sweden (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L., Reyes, M.L.: Human Factors 44(2), 314–334 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lenior, D., Janssen, W., Neerincx, M.A., Schreibers, K.: Human Factors Engineering for Smart Transport: Decision Support for Car Driver and Train Traffic Controller. Applied Ergonomics. Special edition Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics 37(4), 479–490 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., De Waard, D.: A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 5(1), 1–10(13) (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verwey, W.B.: On-line driver workload estimation. Effects of road situation and age on secondary task measures. Ergonomics 43, 187–209(8) (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rino F. T. Brouwer
    • 1
  • Marieka Hoedemaeker
    • 2
  • Mark A. Neerincx
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.TNO Human FactorsSoesterbergThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations