Advertisement

Evaluation of Non-photorealistic 3D Urban Models for Mobile Device Navigation

  • Christos Gatzidis
  • Vesna Brujic-Okretic
  • Maria Mastroyanni
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5622)

Abstract

This research presents a user evaluation study examining the effect different rendering styles of 3D virtual city models, as intended for navigational purposes, could potentially have on users with emphasis on non-photorealistically rendered (NPR) stylizations. The purpose of this experiment is to establish whether, particularly for the application area mentioned above, non-photorealistic, expressive rendering could provide alternative, more effective visual styles than the photorealistic representations of urban areas usually opted for by developers today. 50 participants were exposed to a predominably questionnaire-based study assessing various parameters by observation of the models on a UMPC (Ultra Mobile PC). The results of this research could potentially have significant implications on how future pedestrian navigational software should be visualized in the future.

Keywords

non-photorealistic rendering mobile navigation urban modeling user studies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Duke, D.J., Barnard, P.J., Halper, N., Mellin, M.: Rendering and Affect. Computer Graphics Forum 22(3), 359–368 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Santella, A., Decarlo, D.: Visual Interest and NPR: an Evaluation and Manifesto. In: NPAR 2004, pp. 71–78. ACM Press, Annecy (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Decarlo, D., Finkelstein, A., Rusinkiewicz, S., Santella, A.: Suggestive Contours for Conveying Shape. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22(3), 848–855 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halper, N., Mellin, M., Herrmann, C.S., Linneweber, V., Strothotte, T.: Towards an Understanding of the Psychology of Non-Photorealistic Rendering. In: Workshop Computational Visualistics, Media Informatics and Virtual Communities, pp. 67–78. Deutscher Universitats-Verlag (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halper, N., Mellin, M., Herrmann, C.S., Linneweber, V., Strothotte, T.: Psychology and Non-Photorealistic Rendering: The Beginning of a Beautiful Relationship. Mensch & Computer, 277–286 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schumann, J., Strothotte, T., Raab, A., Laser, S.: Assessing the Effect of Non-photorealistic Rendered Images in CAD. In: CHI 1996, pp. 35–42. ACM Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gooch, A., Willemsen, P.: Evaluating Space Perception in NPR Immersive Environments. In: NPAR 2002, pp. 105–110. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jackson, C.D., Acevedo, D., Laidlaw, D.H., Drury, F., Vote, E., Keefe, D.: Designer-Critiqued Comparison of 2D Vector Visualization Methods: A Pilot Study. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Conference Abstracts and Applications. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, S., Hagh-Shenas, H., Interrante, V.: Conveying Shape with Texture: Experimental Investigation of Texture’s Effects on Shape Categorization Judgments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 10(4), 471–483 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isenberg, T., Neumann, P., Carpendale, S., Sousa, M.C., Jorge, J.A.: Non-photorealistic Rendering in Context: An Observational Study. In: Fourth International Symposium on Non-Photorealistic Animation and Rendering (NPAR 2006), pp. 115–126. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tietjen, C., Isenberg, T., Preim, B.: Combining Silhouettes, Shading, and Volume Rendering for Surgery Education and Planning. In: EuroVis 2005, pp. 303–310, 335. Eurographics Association (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gooch, B., Reinhard, E., Gooch, A.: Human Facial Illustrations: Creation and Psychophysical Evaluation. ACM Transactions on Graphics 23(1), 27–44 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Healey, C.G., Tateosian, L., Enns, J.T., Remple, M.: Perceptually-Based Brush Strokes for Nonphotorealistic Visualization. ACM Transactions on Graphics 23(1), 64–96 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quillet, J.C., Thomas, G., Granier, X., Guitton, P., Marvie, J.E.: Using expressive rendering for remote visualization of large city models. In: 11th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, pp. 27–35. ACM Press, Columbia, Maryland (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diepstraten, J., Gorke, M., Ertl, T.: Remote line rendering for mobile devices. In: CGI 2004: IEEE Computer Graphics International, Crete, pp. 454–461 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gatzidis, C., Brujic-Okretic, V., Liarokapis, F., Baker, S.: Developing a Framework for the Automatic Generation and Visualisation Of 3D Urban Areas on Mobile Devices. In: 10th Symposium For Virtual and Augmented Reality, Joao Pessoa, pp. 151–162 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mountain, D., Liarokapis, F.: Interacting with Virtual Reality scenes on mobile devices. In: Mobile HCI 2005: 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, pp. 331–332. ACM Press, Salzburg (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christos Gatzidis
    • 1
  • Vesna Brujic-Okretic
    • 2
  • Maria Mastroyanni
    • 2
  1. 1.School Of Design, Engineering And ComputingBournemouth UniversityPooleUK
  2. 2.Department of Information Science, School Of InformaticsCity UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations