Representation and Reflexivity in ICT for Development (Telecentre) Research
The author argues there is insufficient discussion of representation (the problems of showing the realities of the lived experiences of the observed settings) and reflexivity (the relationship between knowledge and the ways whereby knowledge is produced) in ICTD literature, particularly regarding telecentre users and non-users. It first reviews six papers from 2007-8 in Information Technologies and International Development and find that the process of research methods and theorizing from findings could be analyzed in more detail. It then shares how deconstructing the research process affected findings in Our Voices telecentre, the author’s own case study.
Keywordstelecentre telecentre users representation reflexivity research method
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Crotty, M.: The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage, London (1998)Google Scholar
- 3.Esterberg, K.G.: Qualitative methods in social research. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
- 4.Geertz, C.: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New York (1973)Google Scholar
- 5.Altheide, D., Johnson, J.: Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Handbook of quantitative research, pp. 485–499. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
- 6.Roman, R., Blattman, C.: Research for Telecenter Development: Obstacles and Opportunities. Journal of Development Communication: Special Issue on Telecenters 12 (2001)Google Scholar
- 7.Harley, B., Hardy, C., Alvesson, M.: Reflecting on reflexivity. In: Academy of Management Conference Proceedings (2004)Google Scholar
- 8.Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S.: The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage, London (1994)Google Scholar
- 10.Alvesson, M.: Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: a reflexive approach to interviews in organisational research. Academy of Management Review 28, 13–33 (2003)Google Scholar
- 18.Devereux, S., Hoddinott, J.: Fieldwork in developing countries. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead (1992)Google Scholar
- 19.Bernard, H.R.: Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage, London (2000)Google Scholar