Advertisement

This Is Who I Am and This Is What I Do: Demystifying the Process of Designing Culturally Authentic Technology

  • Wanda Eugene
  • Leshell Hatley
  • Kyla McMullen
  • Quincy Brown
  • Yolanda Rankin
  • Sheena Lewis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5623)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to bridge the gap between existing frameworks for the design of culturally relevant educational technology. Models and guidelines that provide potential frameworks for designing culturally authentic learning environment are explained and transposed into one comprehensive design framework, understanding that integrating culture into the design of educational technology promotes learning and a more authentic user experience. This framework establishes principles that promote a holistic approach to design.

Keywords

human-computer interaction cultural relevance educational technology design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, N.G.: What Does It Mean?: Exploring the Myths of Multimedia Education. Urban Education 30, 27–39 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aykin, N.: Usability and Internationalization of Information Technology. Lawence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banks, J.A., McGee, C.A.: Multicultural Education. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barba, R.: Multicultural Infusion: A Strategy For Science Teacher Preparation. In: National Association for Research in Science Teaching Atlanta (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boykin, A.: Harvesting Talent and Culture: African American Children and Educational Reform. In: Rossi, R.J. (ed.) Schools and Students at Risk: Context and Framework for Positive Change, pp. 116–138. Teachers College Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown, J., Collins, A., Duguid, P.: Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher 18, 32–41 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bourges-Waldegg, P., Scrivener, S.A.R.: Applying and Testing an Approach to Design for Culturally Diverse User Groups. Interacting with Computers 13, 111–123 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feger, M.: “I Want to Read”: How Culturally Relevant Texts Increase Student Engagement in Reading. Multicultural Education 13(3), 18–19 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaver, B., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E.: Cultural Probes. ACM Interactions Magazine 1, 21–29 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gay, G.: Culturally Responsive Teaching. Teachers College Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green, J.W., Holmes, G., Sherman, T.A.: Culture as a Decision Variable for Designing Computer Software. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 26, 3–18 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grimes, A., Bednar, M., Bolter, J.D., Grinter, R.E.: EatWell: Sharing Nutrition-Related Memories in a Low-Income Community. In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2008, San Diego, CA (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gulz, A., Haake, M.: Virtual pedagogical agents - design guidelines regarding visual appearance and pedagogical roles, Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, pp. 1848–1852 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gutierrez, K., Rogoff, B.: Culture Ways of Learning: Individual Traits and or Repertoires of Practice. Educational Researcher 32, 19–25 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heath, S.B.: Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herrington, J., Oliver, R.: An Instructional Design Framework For Authentic Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 48, 23–48 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    John-Steiner, V., Mahn, H.: Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist 31 (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kroeber, A.L., Kluckhohn, C.: Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology Papers 47 (1952)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ladson-Billings, G.: Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal 32(3), 465–491 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lave, J.: Situating learning in communities of practice. In: Resnick, L., Levine, S., Teasley, L. (eds.) Perspectives of socially shared cognition, Leithwood, K., Begley, P.T., Cousins, J., pp. 63–82. American Psychological Association, Washington (1988)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, C.D.: Bridging home and school literacies: Models for culturally responsive teaching, a case for African American English in Heath. In: Brice, S., Lapp, D. (eds.) A Handbook for Literacy Educators: Research on Teaching the Communicative and Visual Arts, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, C.D.: Toward A Framework for Culturally Responsive Design in Multimedia Computer Environments: Cultural Modeling as a Case. Mind, Culture, and Activity 10(1), 42–61 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, C.D.: Culture, Literacy, and Learning Taking: Taking Bloom in the Midst of the Whirlwind. Teachers College, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leonard, J., Davis, J.: Cultural Relevance and Computer-Assisted Instruction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 37(3) (Spring, 2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Merrill, M.D.: Instructional transaction theory (ITT): instructional design based on knowledge objects. In: Reigeluth, C.M. (ed.) Instructional Design Theory and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, vol. II, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nasir, N.: Points ain’t everything”: Emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African American students. Anthropology and Education 31(1), 283–305 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Norman, D.: Affordances, conventions and design. ACM Interactions Magazine, 38–42 (May/June 1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pinkard, N.: Lyric Reader: Creating Intrinsically Motivating and Culturally Responsive Reading Environments. CIERA Report. CIERA/University of Michigan (2001), http://www.ciera.org
  29. 29.
    Preece, Y., Rogers, H.S.: Interaction Design: beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reis, N.M., Kay, S.: Incorporating Culturally Relevant Pedagogy into the Teaching of Science: The Role of the Principal. Electronic Journal of Literacy Through Science 6(1), 54–57 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R.M., Correa-Chavez, M., Angelillo, C.: Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology 54, 175–203 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tharp, R.G.: Culturally compatible education: A formula for designing effective classrooms. In: Trueba, H.T., Spindler, G., Spindler, L. (eds.) What do anthropologists have to say about drop outs?, pp. 51–66. Falmer Press, NY (1989)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes, 14th edn. Harvard University Press (1978)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Young, P.A.: The Culture Based Model: Constructing a Model of Culture. Educational Technology & Society 11(2), 107–118 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wanda Eugene
    • 1
  • Leshell Hatley
    • 2
  • Kyla McMullen
    • 3
  • Quincy Brown
    • 4
  • Yolanda Rankin
    • 5
  • Sheena Lewis
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Software EngineeringAuburn UniversityUSA
  2. 2.College of Information StudiesUniversity of MarylandUSA
  3. 3.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Department of Computer ScienceDrexel UniversityUSA
  5. 5.IBM Almaden Research CenterSan JoseUSA
  6. 6.Center of Technology and Social BehaviorNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations