PC-Based Rehabilitation System with Biofeedback

  • Chih-Fu Wu
  • Jeih-Jang Liou
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5624)


The purpose of this research is to emphasize on the concept of integrating computer and interactive technologies to the rehabilitation robotic with biofeedback. First, the robot is actuated with pneumatic muscle actuator which have interesting characteristics that can be exploited for upper limbed machines. The rehabilitation robotic system is using measurement which has two channels to detect and collect the rehabilitation robotic system from electromyography and the rotary encoder. Through PCI interface transferring the rehabilitation robotic system to personal computer, we can use our algorithms to attain real-time the force and/or contraction velocity of the muscle detection and other common information like the frequency of under muscle curve of user. Finally, the human-computer interface for rehabilitation system is designed. In this human computer interface consists of three main parts: detect the signal; a control scheme of robotic system combined with multimodal environment based biofeedback system; clinical database.


rehabilitation robotic biofeedback human computer interface 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Tondu, B., Lopez, P.: Modeling and Control of McKibben Artificial Muscle Robot Actuators. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 15–38 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chou, C.P., Hannaford, B.: Static and Dynamic Characteristic of McKibben Pneumatic Artificial Muscles. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, pp. 281–286 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsagarakis, N., Caldwell, D.G., Medrano-Cerda, G.A.: A 7 DOF pneumatic muscle actuator (pMA) powered exoskeleton. In: 8th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interaction RO-MAN 1999, pp. 327–333 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergamasco, M., Micheli, D.M., Parrini, G., Salsedo, F., Marchese, S.S.: Design Considerations for Glove Like Advanced Interface. In: Proceedings International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Pisa, Italy (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caldwell, D.G., Medrano-Cerda, G.A., Goodwin, M.: Charakteristics and Adaptive Control of Pneumatic Muscle Actuators for a Robotic Elbow (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caldwell, D.G., Tsagarakis, N., Medrano-CerdaS, G.A.: Bio-mimetic actuators: polymeric pseudo muscle actuators and pneumatic muscle actuators for biological emulation. Mechatronics 10, 499–530 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reynolds, D.B., Repperger, D.W., Phillips, C.A., Bandry, G.: Modeling the dynamic characteristics of pneumatic muscle. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31, 310–317 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prior, S.D., White, A.S.: Measurement and simulation of a pneumatic muscle actuator for a rehabilitation robot. Simulation Practice and Theory 3, 81–117 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Noritsugu, T., Tanaka, T.: Application of rubber artificial muscle manipulator as a rehabilitation robot. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2, 259–267 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caldwell, D.G., Tsagarakis, N., Medrano-Cerda, G.A., Schofield, J., Brown, S.: A pneumatic muscle actuator driven manipulator for nuclear waste retrieval. Control Engineering Practice 9, 23–36 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lilly, J.H.: Adaptive tracking for pneumatic muscle actuators in bicep and tricep configurations. IEEE Transactions on Neural System and Rehabilitation Engineering 11(3), 333–339 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, L., Lilly, J.H.: Sliding mode tracking for pneumatic muscle actuators in bicep/tricep pair configurations. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, Colorado, June 4-6, 2003, pp. 4669–4674 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    No-Cheol, Hyun-Seok, Parj, H.-W., Park, Y.-P.: Position/vibration control of two-degree-of-freedom arms having one flexible link with artificial pneumatic muscle actuator. Robotics and Autonomous System 40, 239–253 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inoue, K.: Rubber actuators and applications for robotics. In: Bolles, R., Roth, B. (eds.) Robotics Research: The 4th International Symposium. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Luca, C.J.: The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 13(2), 135–163 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chih-Fu Wu
    • 1
  • Jeih-Jang Liou
    • 1
  1. 1.TaipeiTaiwan (R.O.C.)

Personalised recommendations