A Selection of Human Factors Tools: Measuring HCI Aspects of Flight Deck Technologies

  • Rolf Zon
  • Henk van Dijk
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5639)

Abstract

Within the HILAS project two experiments in high fidelity flight simulators were performed. In the current paper results from one of those experiments are discussed. Focus of that discussion is on the added value of using a set of HF tools rather than individual tools and on a number of lessons that were identified from this experiment. The set of Human Factors tools that was applied in this experiment might be helpful for manufacturers of flight deck technologies or aviation authorities to establish whether new technologies should receive the predicate “Human factors certified”.

Keywords

HILAS Human Factors HF flight deck experiment flight simulation HF tools registry certification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van Dijk, H., Zon, G.D.R.: HILAS D3.3.3.1. - Description of conditions to be varied and the applicable scenarios, GRACE experiment, NLR-CR-2008-539, NLR, Amsterdam (August - September 2008) (2008a)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Dijk, H., Zon, G.D.R.: HILAS D3.3.3.2. - Briefing guide GRACE experiment, NLR-CR-2008-478, NLR, Amsterdam (August - September 2008) (2008b) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Dijk, H., Zon, G.D.R.: Situational Awareness assessment in flight simulator experiment. In: The proceedings of the International Symposium on Aviation psychology (ISAP), Dayton, OHIO, April 27-30 (to be published, 2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Egter Wissekerke, R.F.: GRACE - Generic Research Aircraft Cockpit Environment. NLR-Memorandum ATTH-2004-014, NLR, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Endsley, M.R.: Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT). IEEE CH2596-5/88/0000-0789, pp. 789–795 (1988)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Human Factors Working Group for U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration: Advisory Circular (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kooi, F.L., Santamaria Maurizio, C., et al.: HILAS D3.2.4.1 Report with the analysis results and the comparison with the results of the design analysis. HILAS D3.2.4.1 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kooi, F. L., Toet, A.: Additive and subtractive transparent depth displays. In: Verly, J. G. (ed.) Enhanced and synthetic vision 2003, SPIE-5081, pp. 58–65. The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham (2003) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Catton, L., Starr, A., Noyes, J., Williams, D.: The use of Low Cost Simulators as a predictor of human performance. In: International Ergonomics Association conference, Beijing China, August 9–14 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roerdink, M.I., Zon, G.D.R.: Briefing guide GRACE experiment, NLR CR-2006-806, NLR, Amsterdam (January–February 2007) (2006). Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zon, G.D.R., Roerdink, M.I.: HCI Testing in Flight Simulator: Set Up and Crew Briefing Procedures - Unique Design and Test Cycle. In: Proceedings HCI International 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zon, G.D.R., Roerdink, M.I.: HILAS D3.1.2.1 Assessment methodology and tools, NLR-CR-2006-275, NLR, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zon, G.D.R., van Dijk, H., et al.: HILAS D3.4.1.1 - Report with the results of the evaluation experiments (to be published in August 2009) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zon, G.D.R., de Waard, D., Heffelaar, T.: Human Factors measurement and analysis tools for cockpit evaluation and pilot behaviour. In: Workshop at “Measuring Behavior” Conference, Maastricht, the Netherlands, August 26–29 (2008), http://www.noldus.com/mb2008/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rolf Zon
    • 1
  • Henk van Dijk
    • 1
  1. 1.National Aerospace Laboratory NLRAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations