Advertisement

Direct Perception Displays for Military Radar-Based Air Surveillance

  • Oliver Witt
  • Morten Grandt
  • Heinz Küttelwesch
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5639)

Abstract

Air surveillance is among the time-critical and highly prioritized tasks of naval ships, in which the human operator will stay the decision maker in the future as well. User-oriented human-systems integration requires the provision of ergonomically optimized user interfaces. Based on functional system descriptions in the form of abstraction hierarchies, perceptive displays were developed for air surveillance that constitute an advancement with respect to so far principally alphanumerical displays supporting the operator with an improved situation awareness in his decision-making processes. It concerns, in detail, displays for the tactical situation picture, the explicit information about airborne contacts as well as the condition and the configuration of system state especially regarding the radar equipment.

Keywords

Abstraction hierarchy user interface polar diagram military combat direction systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Orasanu, J., Connolly, T.: The reinvention of decision making. In: Klein, G.A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., Zsambok, C.E. (eds.) Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, pp. 3–21. Ablex Publishing Corporation, NJ (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jamieson, G.A., Vicente, K.J.: Ecological interface design for petrochemical applications: supporting operator adaptation, continuous learning, and distributed, collaborative work. Computers and Chemical Engineering 25, 1055–1074 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yamaguchi, Y., Tanabe, F.: Creation and Evaluation of an Ecological Interface System for Operation Nuclear Reactor System. In: Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 3(2000), pp. 571–574 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burns, C.M., Bryant, D.J., Chalmers, B.A.: Boundary, Purpose, and Values in Work-Domain Models: Models of Naval Command and Control. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans 35(5), 603–616 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A.M., Goodstein, L.P.: Cognitive Systems Engineering. Wiley, NY (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer Based Work. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, H.Y.W., Burns, C.M., Lamoureux, T.: Work Domain Analysis for the Interface Design of a Sonobuoy System. In: 51th Annual General Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Baltimore, MA (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wickens, C.D.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Harper Collins, New York (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Witt
    • 1
  • Morten Grandt
    • 1
  • Heinz Küttelwesch
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Processing, and ErgonomicsFGAN-Research Institute for CommunicationWachtbergGermany

Personalised recommendations