Understanding the Impact of Rail Automation
Over the past ten a number of studies have been conducted to understand the way in which rail signalling operations are completed. This paper reviews some of the themes that have emerged from this body of work and considers two principal questions – firstly, how should we apply human factors methods to develop our understanding of the impact of automation and secondly, how can we link the data we have collected from the rail work to theoretical concepts that will help us to design future automation systems?
Keywordsautomation rail workload observation simulation performance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Balfe, N., Wilson, J.R., Sharples, S., Clarke, T.: Structured Observations of Automation Use. In: Bust, P. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics, pp. 552–557 (2008)Google Scholar
- 4.Pickup, L., Wilson, J.R., Norris, B.J., Mitchell, L., Morrisroe, G.: The Integrated Workload Scale (IWS): A new self-report tool to assess railway signaller workload Applied Ergonomics, vol. 36(6), pp. 681–693 (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. In: Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K., Leplat, J. (eds.) New Technology and Human Error, pp. 271–283. Wiley, Chichester (1983)Google Scholar
- 6.Balfe, N., Wilson, J.R., Sharples, S., Clarke, T.: Effects of level of signalling automation. In: Third International Conference on Rail Human Factors, Lille (March 2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Golightly, D., Millen, L.: Situation Awareness Pilot Study. IOE Report prepared for Network Rail IOE/RAIL/09/04/DR (2009)Google Scholar
- 8.Nichols, S., Bristol, N., Wilson, J.R.: Workload assessment in Railway Control. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychology & Cognitive Ergonomics (2001)Google Scholar
- 9.Ames, L.L., George, E.J.: Revision and verification of a seven-point workload scale (AFFTC-TIM-93-01). Edwards AFB, CA: Air Force Flight Test Center (1993)Google Scholar
- 10.Balfe, N.: Personal Communication, February 19 (2009)Google Scholar