Understanding the Impact of Rail Automation

  • Sarah Sharples
  • Nora Balfe
  • David Golightly
  • Laura Millen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5639)

Abstract

Over the past ten a number of studies have been conducted to understand the way in which rail signalling operations are completed. This paper reviews some of the themes that have emerged from this body of work and considers two principal questions – firstly, how should we apply human factors methods to develop our understanding of the impact of automation and secondly, how can we link the data we have collected from the rail work to theoretical concepts that will help us to design future automation systems?

Keywords

automation rail workload observation simulation performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Heath, C., Luff, P.: Collaboration and Control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Computer Supported Co-operative Work (CSCW) 1(1-2), 69–94 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farrington-Darby, T., Wilson, J., Norris, B., Clarke, T.: A naturalistic study of railway controllers. Ergonomics 49(12-13), 1370–1394 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balfe, N., Wilson, J.R., Sharples, S., Clarke, T.: Structured Observations of Automation Use. In: Bust, P. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics, pp. 552–557 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pickup, L., Wilson, J.R., Norris, B.J., Mitchell, L., Morrisroe, G.: The Integrated Workload Scale (IWS): A new self-report tool to assess railway signaller workload Applied Ergonomics, vol. 36(6), pp. 681–693 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. In: Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K., Leplat, J. (eds.) New Technology and Human Error, pp. 271–283. Wiley, Chichester (1983)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balfe, N., Wilson, J.R., Sharples, S., Clarke, T.: Effects of level of signalling automation. In: Third International Conference on Rail Human Factors, Lille (March 2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golightly, D., Millen, L.: Situation Awareness Pilot Study. IOE Report prepared for Network Rail IOE/RAIL/09/04/DR (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nichols, S., Bristol, N., Wilson, J.R.: Workload assessment in Railway Control. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychology & Cognitive Ergonomics (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ames, L.L., George, E.J.: Revision and verification of a seven-point workload scale (AFFTC-TIM-93-01). Edwards AFB, CA: Air Force Flight Test Center (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balfe, N.: Personal Communication, February 19 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Sharples
    • 1
  • Nora Balfe
    • 1
  • David Golightly
    • 1
  • Laura Millen
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Factors Research Group, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations