Advertisement

The Application of Human Error Template (HET) for Redesigning Standard Operational Procedures in Aviation Operations

  • Wen-Chin Li
  • Don Harris
  • Yueh-Ling Hsu
  • Lon-Wen Li
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5639)

Abstract

Human Error Template (HET) is a checklist style approach to predict human errors in the cockpit for developing accident prevention strategies. It is applied to each bottom level task step in a hierarchical task analysis (HTA) of the task in question. This research applies the latest technique for human error prediction- Human Error Template to predict the potential design-induced human errors in the IDF during the landing phase of flight and provide a basis for improving software design and hardware equipment to enhance flight safety. In military operations emphasis is on the fulfillment of SOPs in an attempt to prevent incidents/accidents resulting from human factors. By the use of the scientific approach of HTA to evaluate current SOPs together with formal error analysis of the pilot’s, interface design and procedures, the air force’s combat effectiveness will be improved and a user-friendly cockpit interface can be developed.

Keywords

Aviation Safety Hierarchical Task Analysis Human Error Template Standard Operation Procedure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dekker, S.: The Re-invention of Human Error. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 1(3), 247–266 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diaper, D., Stanton, N.A.: Handbook of Task Analysis in Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Federal Aviation Administration, Report on the Interfaces between Flightcrews and Modern Flight Deck Systems, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington DC (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris, D., Stanton, N.A., Marshall, A., Young, M.S., Demagalski, J., Salmon, P.M.: Using SHERPA to Predict Design-Induced Error on the Flight Deck. Aerospace Science and Technology 9, 525–532 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirwan, B., Ainsworth, L.K.: A Guide to Task Analysis. Taylor and Francis, London (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, W.C., Harris, D.: Pilot error and its relationship with higher organizational levels: HFACS analysis of 523 accidents. Aviation Space Environmental Medicine 77(10), 1056–1061 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, W.C., Harris, D.: Eastern Minds in Western Cockpits: Meta-analysis of human factors in mishaps from three nations. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 78(4), 420–425 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marshall, A., Stanton, N., Young, M., Salmon, P., Harris, D., Demagalski, J., Waldmann, T., Dekker, S.: Development of the Human Error Template – a new methodology for assessing design induced errors on aircraft flight decks. Final Report of the ERRORPRED Project E!1970. Department of Trade and Industry, London (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stanton, N.A., Baber, C.: Error by design: methods for predicting device usability. Design Studies 23, 363–384 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanton, N.A., Harris, D., Salmon, P.M., Demagalski, J.M., Marshall, A., Young, M.S., Dekker, S.W., Waldmann, T.: Predicting Design Induced Pilot Error Using HET- A New Formal Human Error Identification Method for Flight Decks. The Aeronautical Journal 110, 107–115 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P.: Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Ashgate, London (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stanton, N.A., Stevenage, S.V.: Learning to predict human error: issues of reliability, validity and acceptability. Ergonomics 41, 1737–1756 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen-Chin Li
    • 1
  • Don Harris
    • 2
  • Yueh-Ling Hsu
    • 3
  • Lon-Wen Li
    • 4
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentNational Defense UniversityTaiwan, R.O.C.
  2. 2.Human Factors DepartmentCranfield UniversityUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.Department of Air TransportationKainan UniversityTaiwan, R.O.C.
  4. 4.Training CentreNational Defense UniversityTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations