Ergonomic Analysis of Different Computer Tools to Support the German Air Traffic Controllers

  • Muriel Didier
  • Margeritta von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff
  • Ralph Bruder
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5639)

Abstract

The Institute of Ergonomics of the Darmstadt University of Technology supported the German Air Traffic Control in analyzing how the implementation of new tools influences the work procedures of the air traffic controllers and if a modification of the work structures is necessary. New tools, such as “Data link” (contact with the pilot via an electronic connection), the Problem Display Window and the Main Data Window that replaces the former flight strips, were tested in simulations. The goals of the study were to select the most appropriate investigation method to be used, taking into account the specific features of the controllers’ work, to test different tools in a simulated environment and to analyze the impact of the new tools on the air traffic controllers.

Keywords

ergonomic analysis air traffic controller eye movements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Phillip, U., Reiche, D., Kirchner, J.H.: The use of subjective rating. Ergonomics 14, 611–616 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pfendler, C.: Measuring mental workload with the NASA Task Load Index. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 44(3), 153–163 (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thakay, R.I., Touchstone, R.M.: Detection Efficiency on an air traffic control monitoring task with and without computer aiding. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 60(8), 744–748 (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harrigan, J.A., Rosenthal, E., Scherer, K.R.: The new Handbook of Methods in nonverbal behaviour research. Oxford University Press, London (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Henderson, P.R., Bakal, D.A., Dunn, B.E.: Cardiovascular response pattern and speech: a study of air controllers. Psychosomatic Medicine 52, 17–26 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wierwille, W.W., Rahimi, M., Casali, J.G.: Evaluation of 16 Measures of Mental workload using a simulated flight task emphasizing mediational activity. Human Factors 27(5), 489–502 (1985)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schroiff, H.-W.: Zum Stellenwert von Blickbewegungsdaten bei der Mikroanalyse kognitiver Prozesse. In: Issing, L.-J., Midckasch, H.D., Haack, J. (eds.) Blickbewegung und Bildverarbeitung, Peter Lang, Frankfurt (1986)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: Inference processes during reading: reflection from eye fixations. In: Senders, j.W., Fisher, D.F., Monty, R.A. (eds.) Eye movements and the higher psychological functions. Erlbaum, New York (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muriel Didier
    • 1
  • Margeritta von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff
    • 1
  • Ralph Bruder
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of ErgonomicsDarmstadt University of TechnologyDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations