Confidence Bias in Situation Awareness

  • Ketut Sulistyawati
  • Yoon Ping Chui
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5639)

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the concept of confidence bias in Situation Awareness (SA), i.e., the perception of own situational knowledge, a meta-cognition aspect of SA. Two studies were conducted to evaluate the nature of confidence bias across the present and future status, and across individual and team missions, as well as its relation with performance outcome. The results from both studies were consistent. Participants’ confidence bias was higher in the future than present status, but did not differ significantly across individual and team missions. Participants who had lower confidence bias were found to have better performance.

Keywords

situation awareness confidence bias meta-cognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37, 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Proceedings of the IEEE National Aerospace Electronic Conference, pp. 789–795 (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Durso, F.T., Hackworth, C.A., Truitt, T., Crutchfield, J., Manning, C.A.: Situation awareness as a predictor of performance in en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Quarterly 6, 1–20 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hogg, D.N., Folleso, K., Strand-Volden, F., Torralba, B.: Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plan control rooms. Ergonomics 38, 2394–2413 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor, R.M.: Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design, in Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operation (AGARD-CP-478). NATO-AGARD, Neuilly Sur Seine, France (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waag, W.L., Houck, M.R.: Tools for assessing situational awareness in an operational fighter environment. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 65, A13–A19 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGuinness, B., Foy, L.: A subjective measure of SA: The Crew Awareness Rating Scale (CARS). In: Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation Conference. Savannah, Georgia (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Endsley, M.R., Selcon, S.J., Hardiman, T.D., Croft, D.G.: A comparative analysis of SAGAT and SART for evaluations of situation awareness. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 82–86. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Endsley, M.R., Sollenberger, R., Stein, E.: Situation awareness: A comparison of measures. In: Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation: User Centered Design for the New Millennium Conference. SA Technologies, Inc., Savannah, GA (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alfredson, J.: Differences in Situational Awareness and How to Manage Them in Development of Complex Systems. Linkoping University, Linkoping (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nofi, A.A.: Defining and Measuring Shared Situation Awareness. Center for Naval Analyses (2000) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Endsley, M.R.: Predictive utility of an objective measure of situation awareness. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 41–45. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Orlando (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischoff, B.: Perceived informativeness of facts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3, 349–358 (1977)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., Phillips, L.D.: Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980. In: Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A. (eds.) Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, pp. 3–20. Cambridge University Press, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lichacz, F.M.J., Cain, B., Patel, S.: Calibration of confidence in situation awareness queries. In: Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 222–226 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McGuinness, B.: Quantitative analysis of situational awareness (QUASA): Applying signal detection theory to true/false probes and self ratings. In: 9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium: The Power of Information Age Concepts and Technologies, San Diego, California (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ketut Sulistyawati
    • 1
  • Yoon Ping Chui
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Human Factors and Ergonomics School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations