Advertisement

Harnessing the Power of Multiple Tools to Predict and Mitigate Mental Overload

  • Charneta Samms
  • David Jones
  • Kelly Hale
  • Diane Mitchell
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5639)

Abstract

Predicting the effect of system design decisions on operator performance is challenging, particularly when a system is in the early stages of development. Tools such as the Improved Performance Research Integration Tool (IMPRINT) have been used successfully to predict operator performance by identifying task/design combinations leading to potential mental overload. Another human performance modeling tool, the Multimodal Interface Design Support (MIDS) tool, allows system designers to input their system specifications into the tool to identify points of mental overload and provide multi-modal design guidelines that could help mitigate the overload identified. The complementary nature of the two tools was recognized by Army Research Laboratory (ARL) analysts. The ability of IMPRINT to stochastically identify task combinations leading to overload combined with the power of MIDS to address overload conditions with workload mitigation strategies led to ARL sponsorship of a proof of concept integration between the two tools. This paper aims to demonstrate the utility of performing low-cost prototyping to combine associated technologies to amplify the utility of both systems. The added capabilities of the integrated IMPRINT/MIDS system are presented with future development plans for the system.

Keywords

mental workload overload IMPRINT MIDS command and control multimodal integrated toolset 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beideman, L.R., Munro, I., Allender, L.: IMPRINT Modeling for Selected Crusader Research Issues, U.S. Army Research Laboratory: Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Little, R., Dahl, S., Plott, B., Wickens, C., Powers, J., Tillman, B., Davilla, D., Hutchins, C.: Crew reduction in armored vehicles ergonomic study (CRAVES) (ARL-CR-80), Army Research Laboratory, APG, MD (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mitchell, D.K.: Predicted Impact of an Autonomous Navigation System (ANS) and Crew-Aided Behaviors (CABs) on Soldier Workload and Performance, ARL-TR-4342, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mitchell, D.K., Samms, C.L., Kozycki, R.W., Kilduff, P.W., Swoboda, J.C., Animashaun, A.F.: Soldier Mental Workload, Space Claims, and Information Flow Analysis of the Combined Arms Battalion Headquarters Command and Control Cells, ARL-TR-3861, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    North, R.A., Riley, V.A.: W/INDEX: A predictive model of operator workload. In: McMillan, G.R. (ed.) Applications of human performance models to system design. Plenum Press, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Improved Performance Research Integration Tool (2009), http://www.arl.army.mil/IMPRINT

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charneta Samms
    • 1
  • David Jones
    • 2
  • Kelly Hale
    • 2
  • Diane Mitchell
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Army Research LaboratoryHuman Research and Engineering Directorate, ATTN: AMSRD-ARL-HR-MB, Aberdeen Proving GroundMarylandUSA
  2. 2.Design Interactive, Inc.Oviedo

Personalised recommendations