Comparison of Mobile Device Navigation Information Display Alternatives from the Cognitive Load Perspective

  • Murat Can Cobanoglu
  • Ahmet Alp Kindiroglu
  • Selim Balcisoy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5639)


In-vehicle information systems (IVIS) should minimize the cognitive load on the drivers to reduce any risk of accidents. For that purpose we built an experiment in which two alternatives for information display are compared. One alternative is the traditional information display method of showing a map with the target route highlighted in red. This is compared against a proposed alternative for information display in which prior to a junction a ground-level photo is displayed with a large red arrow pointing at the correct route the driver must take. The photo-enhanced information display method required 39% more time spent while gazing at the screen but provided a 10% reduction in the total number of headturns. Based on the participant comments, 80% of whom opted for the non-photo enhanced method, we concluded that the cognitive load brought on by the photo-enhancement is not worth the return.


Cognitive load information display navigation time-based comparison 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Joseph Pompei, F., Sharon, T., Buckley, S.J., Kemp, J.: An Automobile-Integrated System for Assessing and Reacting to Driver Cognitive Load. In: Proceedings of Covergence 2002, pp. 411–416. IEEE SAE, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krum, D.M., Omoteso, O., Ribarsky, W., Starner, T., Hodges, L.F.: Evaluation of a Multimodal Interface for 3D Terrain Visualization. In: 13th IEEE Visualization 2002, VIS 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Viitala-Kiss, T., Ikonen, J.: GPS Assisted Alternative Path Modeling and Guidance. In: 2006 International Conference on Software in Telecommunications and Computer Networks, pp. 167–171 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    European Statement of Principles on Human Machine Interface for In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems (1998), (retrieved on 24-02-2009)
  5. 5.
    Blanco, M., Biever, W.J., Gallagher, J.P., Dingus, T.A.: The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention 38, 895–906 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biever, W.J.: Auditory based supplemental information processing demand effects on driving performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tönnis, M.: Time-Critical Supportive Augmented Reality - Issues on Cognitive Capture and Perceptional Tunnelling. In: The Fifth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, October 22 - 25 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human Mental Workload 1, 139–183 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tonnis, M., Klinker, G.: Augmented 3D Arrows Reach Their Limits In Automotive Environments. In: Wang, X., Schnabel, M.A. (eds.) Mixed Reality In Architecture, Design And Construction, pp. 185–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nowakowski, C., Green, P.: Map Design: An On-the-Road Evaluation of the Time to Read Electronic Navigation Displays (Technical Report UMTRI-98-4), Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO 15008:2009 Standard,
  12. 12.
    Green, P.: Estimating Compliance with the 15-Second Rule for Driver-Interface Usability and Safety. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murat Can Cobanoglu
  • Ahmet Alp Kindiroglu
  • Selim Balcisoy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations