ICT Services for Every Citizen: The Challenge of Gaps in User Knowledge

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5614)


Many services in our society are digitalized. Being able to access and use information and communication products and services (ICTs) has become a prerequisite for independent living and to fully be able to take part in society. Therefore, ICTs should be designed in such a way that they are usable and accessible to all citizens. Experiences and results from four case studies involving diverse user groups are discussed in this paper. The focuses of the studies were usability and accessibility of ICTs intended to be used by “anyone.” When looking across user interaction observations of these mainstream ICTs, the challenge of gaps in user knowledge were striking. The challenge of defining a basic level of usable and accessible ICT features is also discussed.


universal usability e-Inclusion universal design gaps in user knowledge accessibility user diversity elderly visually impaired 


  1. 1.
    Center for Universal Design,
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Shneiderman, B.: Universal usability. Commun. ACM 43, 84–91 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stephanidis, C., Savidis, A.: Universal Access in the Information Society: Methods, Tools, and Interaction Technologies. Universal Access in the Information Society 1, 40–55 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),
  6. 6.
    ISO/TS 16071: Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Guidance on accessibility for human-computer interfaces. Technical specification. International Organisation for Standardisation. ISO, Switzerland (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, A.: Scaffolding visually cluttered web pages to facilitate accessibility. In: Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces. ACM, Gallipoli (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shneiderman, B.: Promoting universal usability with multi-layer interface design. In: CUU 2003. ACM, Vancouver (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    ICT Digital Literacy Skills Assessment,
  12. 12.
    Fuglerud, K.S.: IKT for et inkluderende arbeidsliv (Eng: ICT for an inclusive working life). Report number: 1009. Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, 28 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fuglerud, K.S., Solheim, I.: Synshemmedes IKT-barrierer (Eng: ICT-barriers for the visually impaired). Report number: 1016. Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, 91 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ELMER, Simplification of public forms,
  15. 15.
    Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., Wallace, R.: Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments. Review of Educational Research 73, 277–320 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Novick, D.G., Ward, K.: Why don’t people read the manual? In: SIGDOC 2006. ACM, Myrtle Beach (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moallem, A.: Usability of Software Online Documentation: A User Study. In: HCI International 2003, vol. 1, pp. 549–553 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aberg, J., Shahmehri, N., Maciuszek, D.: User modelling for live help systems: initial results. In: EC 2001. ACM, Tampa (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matthew, E.: Embedded user assistance: the future for software help? Interactions 14, 30–31 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foglia, P., Giuntoli, F., Prete, C.A., Zanda, M.: Assisting e-government users with animated talking faces. Interactions 14, 24–26 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baecker, R.: Showing instead of telling. In: SIGDOC 2002. ACM, Toronto (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baecker, R., Booth, K., Jovicic, S., McGrenere, J., Moore, G.: Reducing the gap between what users know and what they need to know. In: CUU 2000. ACM, Arlington (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norsk RegnesentralBlindernNorway

Personalised recommendations