Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Need to Reconsider Societal Marketing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Professionals' Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

Marketers have every right to be proud of their field and the contribution they have made to raising standards of living around the world. Yet, despite encouraging the development of beneficial products and services globally, marketing has increasingly become the target of criticism, largely due to the assumptions of the marketing concept. This philosophy advocates satisfying customer needs for profit and has remained dominant for over half a century. Critics question whether this orientation, with a lack of consideration of marketing’s social impacts, is in the best interests of consumers or society in the longer-term. This chapter begins by arguing that the business environment has fundamentally changed since the emergence of the marketing concept as the dominant marketing paradigm. There is a far greater awareness and sensitivity to social and environmental issues. The Societal Marketing Concept (SMC), despite being developed at least 40 years ago, is advocated as being more able to meet both business and social objectives for the long-term. The SMC extends marketing considerations beyond company profits and consumer wants, to include society’s interests. An examination of the history of the SMC reveals that the concept has had little impact on marketing literature or practice because of criticisms that have also been apparent, but largely dealt with, in the corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature. The chapter concludes by examining the CSR journey to address the criticisms of the SMC and thereby provide direction on how the SMC can be advanced.

Marketing’s raison d’être is eminently noble; it alone has the power to align the interests of corporations and their customers directly (and, by extension, society as a whole)…Used wisely and with restraint, marketing can harness and channel the vast energies of the free market system for the good of consumers, corporations, and society as a whole. Used recklessly, it can cause significant harm to all those entities.

Sheth and Sisodia (2005, p. 160)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abratt, R. and Sacks, D. (1988) The Marketing Challenge: Towards Being Profitable and Socially Responsible. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(7), 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S., Hastings, G., and Macfadyen, L. (2002) Strategic Marketing in the UK Tobacco Industry. The Lancet Oncology, 3(8), 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. and Greyser, S. (1968) Advertising in America: The Consumer View, Boston, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1999) Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business and Society, 38, 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chartered Institute of Marketing U.K. (2008) Available at: http://www.cim.co.uk/KnowledgeHub/MarketingGlossary/GlossaryHome.aspx [accessed 20/09/2008].

  • Clarkson, M. (1995) A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordoba, J. and Campbell, T. (2008) Editorial: Special Issue Systems Thinking and Corporate Social Responsibility. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 25(3), 359–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. and Desmond, J. (2002) Societal Marketing and Morality. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 548–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. (1969) The Human Concept: New Philosophy for Business. Business Horizons, 12, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. and Montgomery, D. (1999) Charting New Directions for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowie, M. (1977) How Ford Put Two Million Firetraps on Wheels. Business and Society Review, 23(3), 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. (1971) Societal Adaptation: A New Challenge for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 37(3), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A stakeholder Approach, Boston, Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. and Friedman, R. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. (1982) When a Brand Name Gets Hit by Bad News. U.S. News & World Report 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E. and Melé, D. (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, J. (1985) Dangerous Territory: The Societal Marketing Concept Revisited. Business Horizons, 28, 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IVCA. (2004) The IVCA Launch Clarion Awards 2004 to Promote the Effective Communications of Corporate Social Responsibility. Available at: http://www.nomensa.com [accessed 13/09/2008].

  • Kang, G. and James, J. (2007) Revisiting the Concept of a Societal Orientation: Conceptualization and Delineation. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, T. (2008) Over The Limit The Guardian, available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/responsibledrinking/over.limit [accessed 20/09/2008].

  • Kotler, P. (1972) A generic Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36(4), 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (2004) Ten deadly Marketing Sins: Sign and Solutions, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and Levy, S. (1969) Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33(1), 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., Wong, V., Saunders, J., and Armstrong, G. (2005) Principles of Marketing, Harlow, Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazer, W. (1969) Marketing’s Changing Social Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 33, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. (2008) A Review of the Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Evolutionary Path and the Road Ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., Mackey, T., and Barney, J. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Investor Preferences and Corporate Strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O., and Ferrell, L. (2005) A Stakeholder Model for Implementing Social Responsibility in Marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 956–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marketing Trends Survey. (2007) Fielded by Anderson Analytics, available at: http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/marketing-executives-identify-top-marketing-trends-concepts-in-2008-2565/ [accessed 12/08/2008].

  • Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008) “Implicit” And “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983) The Case For Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Strategy, 4(2), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., Agle, B., and Wood, D. (1997) Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. and Crowther, D. (2002) Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Agenda for Research. Management Decision, 40(4), 302–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, J. (2008) Brown Blasts Age of Irresponsibility. Financial Times, available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/42cc6040-8bea-11dd-8a4c-0000779fd18c.html [accessed 14/08/2008].

  • Porter, M. and Kramer, M. (2006) Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D. and Reidenbach, R. (1987) Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concept and Application. Journal of Marketing, 51, 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. and Sisodia, S. (2005) A Dangerous Divergence: Marketing and Society. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 24(1), 160–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Clurman, A., and Wood, C. (2005) Coming to Concurrence, Evanston, IL, Racom Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2007) Out of Left Field. Business Strategy Review, 18(2), 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. (2000) Marketing Paradise: Citizen Professionals on the Road to Paradise (via Damascus). Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 18(6/7), 321–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, D., Ferrell, O., and Ferrell, L. (2008) Business and Society: A Strategic Approach to Social Responsibility, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International: Corruption Perceptions Index. (2008) available at: http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2008 [accessed 12/09/2008].

  • Wilkie, W. and Moore, E. (1999) Marketing’s Contributions to Society. Journal of Marketing, 63, 198–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, W. and Moore, E. (2003) Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the ‘4 Eras’ of Thought Development. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 22(2), 116–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hull Business School, Hull, UK

    Timothy T. Campbell

  2. Royal Holloway, University of London, Londan, UK

    José-Rodrigo Córdoba

Authors
  1. Timothy T. Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José-Rodrigo Córdoba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. London Metropolitan Business School, London Metropolitan University, Moorgate 84, London, EC2M 6SQ, United Kingdom

    Samuel O. Idowu

  2. Wissenschaften Hamburg, Hochschule für Angewandte, Lohbruegger Kirchstr. 65, Hamburg, 21033, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, T.T., Córdoba, JR. (2009). The Need to Reconsider Societal Marketing. In: Idowu, S., Leal Filho, W. (eds) Professionals' Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02630-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation