Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility from the Perspective of Corporate Secretaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Professionals' Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

Corporate secretaries make a considerable contribution to corporate social responsibility (CSR) processes by the nature of the positions and responsibilities they hold in organisations. They act as a servant or full member of the board of directors, the body that formulates corporate strategies; which are subsequently executed by executive directors. When corporate secretaries become full members of the board, they pass on their duties as the secretary to someone else and take on the role of governance in directorship capacity.

The field of CSR has impacted on all professions that aspire to make a positive contribution to societies. For this reason, members of the chartered secretaries’ professional body and those other chartered bodies in the UK who statutorily can become corporate secretaries have had to absorb all the challenges and opportunities that the field of CSR has thrown at them, albeit in collaboration with their other senior executive colleagues in organisations. This chapter seeks to analyse how corporate secretaries have contributed and continue to contribute to recent developments in the field of CSR. The chapter argues that modern stakeholders look on corporate entities to meet all their economic, social, ethical, legal and philanthropic responsibilities whilst remaining virtuous, Friedman (1962, 1970), Elkington (1997) and Carroll and Buchholtz (2003) even though meeting these responsibilities may at first sight appear contradictory and impossible, de Wit and Meyer (2004). Wood (1991) argues that business and society are interwoven rather than distinct entities. If this is so, then it is relevant to ask how today’s professionals including corporate secretaries are coping with the task of meeting their CSR requirements to society. There are numerous benefits that can emanate from following a good corporate citizenship strategy or being involved in several pro bono publico activities by an entity according to Jones et al. (2006), as this action is one of the variables that determine whether an entity survives and prospers or declines and fails in modern markets.

Success is a ladder that cannot be climbed with your hands in your pockets

American proverb

Those that climb the tree deserve to pick the fruit

Aristotle

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowen, H. R. (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, Harper Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broomhill, R. (2007), Corporate social responsibility: Key issues and Debates. In Orchard, L. and Matiasz, S. (Eds.), Dunstan Papers Series, Don Dustan Foundation, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury Report (1992), The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Gee, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979), A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. and Buchholtz, A. K. (2003), Business: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 7th edition, South Western Pub, Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995), A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahya, J., McConnell, J., and Travlos, N. G. (2002), The Cadbury committee, corporate performance and top management turnover. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 461–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming, D. (2003), Are We Running Out of Oil? Policy Backgrounder No. 159, of the National Centre for Policy Analysis, January 2003, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (2006), Companies Act 2006, HM Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, B. and Meyer, R. (2004), Strategy: Process, Content, Context, 3rd edition, Thompson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997), Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. and Freeland, R. (1995), Theoretical and comparative perspectives on corporate organization. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 21, pp. 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970), The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, The New York Times Magazine, September 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, T. (2007) Grant Thornton’s 6th FTSE 350 Corporate Governance Review December, http://ecomm.grant-thornton.co.uk/ve/zzj0097L929290B66Xe66 [Accessed 12 April 2008].

  • Halal, W. E. (2000), Corporate community: a theory of the firm uniting profitability and responsibility. Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. (2001a), Misguided Virtue – False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. (2001b), The case against corporate social responsibility. Policy, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, S. O. and Towler, B. A. (2004), A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 420–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, S. O. and Papasolomou, I. (2007), Are the corporate social responsibility matters based on good intentions or false pretences? An empirical study of the motivations behind the issue of CSR reports by UK companies. Corporate Governance, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, S. O. (2008a), An empirical study of what institutions of higher education in the UK consider to be their corporate social responsibility. In Aravosis, K., Brebbia, C. A., and Gomez, N. (Eds.), Environmental Economics and Investment Assessment II, WIT Press, Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idowu, S. O. (2008b), Practicing corporate social responsibility in the United Kingdom. In Idowu, S. O. and Filho W. L. (Eds.), Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Accountants (2001), Governance in the Public Sector: A Governing Body Perspective, Study 13, International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), August 2001, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., Comfort, D., and Hillier, D. (2006), Corporate social responsibility and the UK construction industry. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 134–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsoulakos, T. and Katsoulacos, Y. (2007), Strategic management, corporate responsibility and stakeholder management integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: a stakeholder-oriented and integrative strategic framework. Corporate Governance, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and Lee, N. (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause, John Wiley & Son Inc., Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine, M. (2005), Meanings of the term ‘sustainable development’ in Finnish corporate disclosures. Accounting Forum, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, G. P. (2001), The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 595–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M-D. P. (2008), A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippke, R. L. (1996), Setting the terms of the business responsibility debate in Ethics in the workplace, Selected Readings in Business Ethics, Larmer, R. A. (Ed.) West Publishing Co. St. Pauls, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1958), The dangers of social responsibility, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 36, pp. 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, J. (2003), Corporate Social Responsibility: Great Real, Chartered Secretary, October, pp. 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (2001), CSR: A theory of the firm perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C. (1998), The stakeholder corporation. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. D. and Ahrens, J. (1993), The social responsibility of corporations. In White, T. I. (Ed.), Business Ethics: A Philosophical Reader, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks, R. A. G. and Minow, N. (1995), Corporate Governance, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (1999), OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD Publications, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, J., Walker, E., and Wang, C.(2008) Issues for small businesses with waste management. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 88, pp. 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribstern, L. E. (2002), Market versus Regulatory responses to corporate fraud: a critique of the SOX Act of 2002. Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perino, M. A. (2002), Enron’s Legislative Aftermath: Some Reflections on the Deterrence Aspects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper Number 212, St John’s Legal Studies Research Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (1975), Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytical framework. California Management Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1997), A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 737–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776), The Wealth of Nations, Book 1 Chapter II, Methuen & Co, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2005),The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Responsibility, Brooking Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallich, H. C. and McGowan, J. J. (1970), Stockholder and the corporations’ role in social policy. In Baumol, W. J. (Ed.), A New Rationale for Corporate Social Policy, Committee of Economic Development, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991), Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

Electronic Sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Idowu, S.O. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility from the Perspective of Corporate Secretaries. In: Idowu, S., Leal Filho, W. (eds) Professionals' Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02630-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics