Advertisement

The 7 Basic Functions of a Digital Library - Analysis of Focus Groups about the Usefulness of a Thematic Digital Library on the History of European Integration

  • Eric Brangier
  • Jérôme Dinet
  • Laurent Eilrich
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5617)

Abstract

This paper presents the main results of a study involving an original user-centred design approach to modify and improve a specific digital library (DL) related to the history of European integration. The ultimate goal of the project is twofold: (1) to find ways to improve end-users’ use of this thematic DL; (2) to develop an original method to measure real users’ needs and mental representation. This user-centred approach is based on focus groups, this technique being a powerful means to evaluate services or test new ideas. In our study, more precisely, focus groups were set up by conducting interviews with 58 users (researchers, professionals in documentation, journalists, historians, teachers, students, ergonomists, politicians, computer engineers, etc.), but including four to five people at the same time in the same group. Each of these 14 focus groups was videotaped for a 3-hour period and all verbalisations (needs, viewpoints, etc.) were transcribed. Our analysis showed that the users’ needs can be expressed through seven basic functions which match the users’ expectations. This paper brings together the process by which these functions were identified and also discusses the interests, limitations and possible generalisations of these functions in the context of all digital libraries.

Keywords

digital library functions function analysis user-centred design user requirements user needs ENA European integration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Backes, M., LeBrun, M., Sillaume, G.: A multilingual, multisource and multilingual digital library, safeguarding the European heritage. BRICKS: The European solution for Digital Libraries services, Lisbon (2006), http://www.brickscommunity.org/BRICKS-Lisbon
  2. 2.
    Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T. (eds.): The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bishop, A.P., Van House, N.A., Buttenfield, B.P. (eds.): Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borgman, C.L.: The Invisible Library: Paradox of the Global Information Infrastructure. Library Trends 51(4) (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brangier, E., Bastien, J.-M.-C.: L’analyse de l’activité est elle suffisante et/ou pertinente pour innover dans le domaine des nouvelles technologies? In: Vallery, G., Amalberti, R. (eds.) L’analyse du travail en perspectives: influences et évolutions. Toulouse: Octarès, Collection Entreprise, Travail, Emploi, pp. 143–156 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brangier, E.: Besoin et interface. In: Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I. (eds.) Encyclopédie de l’informatique et des systèmes d’information, pp. 1070–1084. Vuibert, Paris (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Consalvi, M., Eilrich, L., Sillaume, G.: Rôles et perspectives des bibliothèques numériques dans l’économie de la connaissance: une étude de cas. In: Colloque En route vers Lisbonne, Luxembourg (2008), http://www.tudor.lu/cms/lisbonne2008/publishing.nsf/0/FDECF548D12BC30BC12575140048AB73/$file/15h30_CONSALVI_EILRICH_SILL.pdf
  8. 8.
    Dinet, J., Vivian, R.: Comportements et stratégies des utilisateurs dans les bibliothèques numériques. In: Papy, F. (ed.) Usages et pratiques dans les bibliothèques numériques, pp. 241–268. Hermès Lavoisier, Paris (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dinet, J. (ed.): Usages, usagers et compétences informationnelles au 21e siècle. Hermès Science Lavoisier, Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goncalves, M.A., Moreira, B.L., Fox, E.A., Watson, L.T.: What is a good digital library? - A quality model for digital libraries. Information Processing & Management 43(5), 1416–1437 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, M.L.W., Gay, G.K., Rieger, R.H.: Comparing Evaluations of Digital Collection Efforts. DLib Magazine 5(11) (1999), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november99/11jones.html
  12. 12.
    Kani-Zabihi, E., Ghinea, G., Chen, S.Y.: User perceptions of online public library catalogues. International Journal of Information Management (2008) (in press)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Komlodi, A., Hou, W., Preece, J., Druin, A., Golub, E., Alburo, J., Liao, S., Elkiss, A., Resnik, P.: Evaluating a cross-cultural children’s online book community: Lessons learned for sociability, usability, and cultural exchange. Interacting with Computers 19(4), 494–511 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pinch, T.J., Bijker, W.E.: The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science 14, 399–441 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silva, L.V., Goncalves, M.A., Laender, A.H.F.: Evaluating a digital library self-archiving service: The BDBComp user case study. Information Processing & Management 43(4), 1103–1120 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsakonas, G., Papatheodoroua, C.: Critical Constructs of Digital Library Interaction (2007), http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00011654/01/PCI2007_TsakonasPapatheodorou_eprints_.pdf
  17. 17.
    Wilson, L.A.: If we build it, will they come? Library users in a digital world. In: Lee, S.H. (ed.) Improved access to information: portals, content selection, and digital information, pp. 19–28. Haworth Information Press, Binghamton (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xie, H.I.: Users’ evaluation of digital libraries (DLs): Their uses, their criteria, and their assessment. Information Processing & Management 44(3), 1346–1373 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Brangier
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jérôme Dinet
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laurent Eilrich
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire Lorrain de Psychologie. Faculté des Sciences Humaines et Arts. BP 30309. Île du SaulcyUniversité Paul Verlaine – Metz. 2LPMetzFrance
  2. 2.Centre Virtuel de la Connaissance sur l’EuropeSanem – Grand Duchy of LuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations