Advertisement

Designing a Peer Reviewing Tool on Lecture Video with Handwritten Annotation

  • Hironori Egi
  • Shotaro Houri
  • Yukari Kato
  • Tatsuya Terada
  • Wataru Tsukahara
  • Masaki Nakagawa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5617)

Abstract

To improve lessons in accordance with students’ comprehension levels, evaluation of teaching performance has been carried out by questionnaire and lesson study. However, lesson study in the context of faculty development is difficult for participants to spend long time for classroom observation and reflective discussion. Even if they have time for discussion, unfocused discussion often causes less fruitful and mutual understanding. We are developing an annotation tool not only to solve the above-mentioned time and space constraint but provide benefits owing to archiving lessons and their reviews. We design a pen-based annotation tool by which reviewers can write comments and draw marks onto on-line and off-line movie of class observation. The details of the annotation tool and user feedback from preliminary experiment in actual classrooms are described in this paper.

Keywords

Annotation lecture video faculty development peer reviewing pen-based interface 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wiburg, K., Brown, S.: Lesson Study Communities. Crown Press (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rahn, N.C., Lim, Y., Groth, D.P.: Redesigning Video Analysis: An Interactive Ink Annotation Tool. In: ACM Proc. of CHI 2008, pp. 3339–3344 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richer, H., Miller, C., Abowd, G.D., Hsi, I.: An Empirical Investigation of Capture and Access for Software Requirements Activities. In: ACM Proc. of Graphics Interface 2005, pp. 121–128 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goularte, R., Cattelan, R., Camacho-Guerrero, J., Inacio Jr., V., Pimentel, M.: Interactive Multimedia Annotations: Enriching and Extending Content. In: Proc. of ACM DocEng. 2004, pp. 84–86 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cattelan, R.G., Teixeira, C., Goularte, R., Pimentel, M.: Watch-and-Comment as a Paradigm toward Ubiquitous Interactive Video Editing. ACM Trans. on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications 4(4), Article 28, 1–34 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramos, G., Balakrishnan, R.: Fluid Interaction Techniques for the Control and Annotation of Digital Video. In: Proc. of ACM UIST 2003, pp. 105–114 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liao, C., Liu, Q., Kimber, D., Chiu, P., Foote, J., Wilcox, L.: Shared Interactive Video for Teleconferencing. In: ACM Proc. of Multimedia 2003, pp. 546–554 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cuthbert, A., Kubinec, M., Tanis, D.O., Ieong, F., Wei, L., Schlossberg, D.: Advanced technology for streamlining the creation of ePortfolio resources and dynamically-indexing digital library assets: a case study from the digital chemistry project. In: ACM Proc. of CHI 2005, pp. 972–987 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., Tarshish, O., Canny, J.: Livenotes: A System for Cooperative and Augmented Note-Taking in Lectures. In: ACM Proc. of CHI 2005, pp. 531–540 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kato, Y., Egi, H., Tsukahara, W., Houri, S., Nakagawa, M.: Development of e-Teaching Portfolio for Ubiquitous Peer Reviewing Process. In: Proc. of Society of Information Technology & Teachers Education (SITE) (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hironori Egi
    • 1
  • Shotaro Houri
    • 2
  • Yukari Kato
    • 3
  • Tatsuya Terada
    • 2
  • Wataru Tsukahara
    • 2
  • Masaki Nakagawa
    • 2
  1. 1.Information Media CenterJapan
  2. 2.Department of Computer and Information StudiesJapan
  3. 3.Center for Higher Education DevelopmentTokyo University of Agriculture and TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations